Steelers demand $20m for new seats, because all the other kids have them already

To the list of “state-of-the-art” accoutrements that sports teams can demand public money for as part of their leases — a list that previously included such items as giant scoreboards and holographic replay systems — we can now add a new item: chairs. The Pittsburgh Steelers are asking a judge to issue a summary judgment on their lawsuit to get the public stadium authority to pay for two-thirds of the costof a 10,000-seat stadium expansion, on the grounds that their leaser equires that taxpayers must supply any addition or modification that, in the words of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, has “been installed in at least half of all NFL stadiums with at least 25 percent of the cost covered by federal, state or local governments.”

The cost of the public’s share of the expansion is expected to be about $20 million, which is roughly $16 million more than the stadium authority has in its capital reserve fund. As Deadspin reports, the Steelers and the stadium authority were looking into paying for the expansion — which will cost $40 million total, including the addition of a new (presumably non-holographic) scoreboard — with ticket and parking surcharges, but that didn’t work out:

The Steelers and the SEA had an agreement in place to fund the expansion by passing the cost on to those who attend games. The plan called for raising an existing surcharge on ticket prices in addition to implementing a parking surcharge. When the deal fell through, the Steelers took the SEA to court. There was a hearing today in front of a county judge—who happens to be a Steelers season-ticket holder, natch—and a ruling is expected within a week.

According to Judith Grant Long’s book, Pittsburgh, Alleghany County, and the state of Pennsylvania already spent $338 million (adjusted to 2010 dollars) on building Heinz Field, so this would raise the total cost to more like $358 million. At least, until more than half of all NFL stadiums get retractable roofs, which may not be that far off.


4 comments on “Steelers demand $20m for new seats, because all the other kids have them already

  1. So why would the Steelers have only built that small of a stadium anyway? They seem like they’d have the fanbase to fill a much bigger stadium.

  2. When the stadium was built the Steelers were only about a decade removed from being irrelevant in Pittsburgh. In the late 80’s and early 90’s the Steelers struggled to fill smaller Three Rivers Stadium at times.

  3. Pittsburgh is a small city with a lot of “pro” cities around (Cincy, Cleveland, Buffalo, Baltimore). It is growing a bit, but the surrounding area has lost a lot of population. Building these seats is probably a mistake.

  4. All of this couldn’t have anything to do with the fact those PSLs that sold for $900 in 2001 are going for $8500 today.

    Wouldn’t be surprised if to get access to those tickets you need to buy a PSL at a hefty price – which the classiest team in the NFL will gladly pocket for themselves.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *.
NOTE: Personal attacks on other commenters are not allowed in comments, and will be deleted.

HTML tags are not allowed.

757,895 Spambots Blocked by Simple Comments