Virginia Beach approves new $200m arena, media fail to report city taxes will pay for most of it

Maybe because of the approaching holidays (not that all of them are still approaching), everyone everywhere voted on everything last night, so let’s get right to it:

The Virginia Beach city council voted 10-1 last night to approve the plan for developers United States Management to build a new $200 million arena, which would (at least at first) be just for concerts, not any sports teams. Here’s how WAVY-TV described the financing:

USM would pay for the $200 million facility and the city would take care of the infrastructure costs of about $76 million.

And here’s how the Virginian-Pilot described the financing, way back in May of 2014:

USM’s plan calls for it to spend more than $200 million of its own money to build the arena, then receive up to $7 million annually in tax revenue to pay down its debt.

That $7 million annually actually turns out to be more like $8.5 million, including kickbacks of all property taxes, business license taxes, admissions taxes, arena meals taxes, construction sales taxes, and the city’s share of arena sales taxes, plus the top 1% off of the city’s 8% hotel tax. (It’s all spelled out on the Virginia Beach Department of Economic Development’s website, albeit hidden in a subsidiary “Revenue Fund Agreement” document.) Add it all up, and the arena developers will actually be getting about $206 million in subsidies for their $200 million arena — with about $130 million of that going directly to pay off the money that the developers plan to borrow from a Chinese government-owned bank for arena construction.

Now, I know that finance is confusing, but you’d think the news reports would have found somewhere to mention the tax kickbacks, even if they buried it way down at the bottom. (The Virginian-Pilot’s article on last night’s vote was similarly silent.) Presumably it wasn’t mentioned in the media because it wasn’t mentioned by any of the elected officials at the hearing, but come on, journalist people, you are allowed to actually read and report things on your own — even Wikipedia is okay with that.

Share this post:

8 comments on “Virginia Beach approves new $200m arena, media fail to report city taxes will pay for most of it

  1. I wouldn’t mind if they get an NBA team but pro arena’s cost twice that amount. Good luck trying to attract a team…

  2. Was trying to make sense of this deal yesterday. First, to think a $210M arena that seats between 15k and 18k, which would make it one of the smallest arenas at the pro-level, is going to be enough to attract pro teams seems short-sighted. Then, USM is only contributing $40M in private equity to the project and borrowing $170M from China. It builds the building, pays all taxes, then VA Beach returns those taxes to USM along with 1% of their hotel tax revenue, to pay the debt service for USM off. Up to $476M over 30 years. Then, an additional $76M, likely from bonds that will be paid back from more hotel tax revs, to fund infrastructure improvements around the arena site (on top of donating the land for the arena). Then, USM turns what will likely be considered an outmoded arena over to the city after 60 years.

    I don’t get this one.

  3. That’s a little sensational, isn’t it? The article is wrong: Barbara Henley, the lone elected official to vote against the deal, clearly mentioned many of the details you claim were not mentioned.

  4. Henley wasn’t quoted at all in the WAVY article, and in the Virginian-Pilot she only raised questions about the Chinese bank loan and whether the city would eventually have to pay for a parking garage, nothing about the tax kickbacks. So I’d have to say: No, not sensational at all.

  5. Here’s the Virginian-Pilot’s article from last week about the deal prior to vote. Gets more into the specifics:

  6. Judging by the article that Playhouse posted a link to, I’d guess that some of the cost savings is expected to be from using imported Chinese glass, steel and seats.

    Seems like a good deal for Virginia Beach as long as the Chinese materials are inexpensive rather than cheap.

Comments are closed.