Cavs subsidy foes scrap petitions, say “never mind, if we get crisis centers it’s all good”

In an unfathomable series of plot twists yesterday in the Cleveland Cavaliers $70 million glass-wall subsidy saga, this happened:

  • Cleveland city council president Kevin Kelley called for an investigation into primary subsidy foes Greater Cleveland Congregations, on the grounds that GCC … got funding from outside the city, I guess? Which wouldn’t be illegal or anything, but would be bad, because damn meddling out-of-towners?
  • Cavs owner Dan Gilbert tweeted that contrary to what a county lawyer had threatened, “I will never move the Cleveland Cavaliers out of Cleveland. Period. And that’s unconditional.”
  • Four of the five GCC members who’d filed the petitions for a public referendum on the Cavs subsidy deal — which is what had led Gilbert to pull out of the plan — wrote to Cleveland City Council Clerk Pat Britt that they were withdrawing the petitions. In exchange, Cuyahoga County — not Gilbert — had promised to build two mental health and substance abuse crisis centers that the GCC had been seeking.
  • Cavs CEO Len Komoroski declared that the arena renovation deal was back on the table, and that “we are very encouraged by this new development related to the private-public partnership plan to transform The Q for the long term.”

As the Cleveland Scene makes clear in its analysis of the crazy day, what happened here is that the county responded to Gilbert calling an end to the arena renovation plan by contacting GCC and asking if there was anything they could do to get the referendum campaign withdrawn. GCC’s price, it turned out, was the two crisis centers, which will cost the county an estimated $10 million to build, and $2.8 million a year combined to run. Once the county agreed to that — though it doesn’t appear that there’s actually anything more than a handshake agreement — GCC agreed to scrap the entire petition drive.

Of course, GCC was actually part of a broader coalition that had put together the referendum campaign — though GCC had been the ones to file it, so they could withdraw it unilaterally. And as the Scene makes clear, those coalition partners are now pissed:

GCC had been vilified as scheming extortionists by the pro-deal side and will now be vilified as sell-outs by their opposition allies. Members of other opposition groups, like the SEIU and the Cuyahoga County Progressive Caucus, are dismayed, if not furious. Some feel betrayed, sold out.

One activist told Scene that they spent hours collecting signatures for the referendum in order to “kill the deal, not help GCC make a deal.” The county’s commitment to investigating the costs of crisis centers — itself a tiny fraction of what GCC initially hoped to attain — is in any event considered to be vastly less important than the victory for democracy that has been short-circuited.

(Cutting a deal with your opponents without even telling your coalition partners, incidentally, is what really should be known in the community-benefits game as a “Bertha Lewis move.”)

I am very frightened by these chemical peels. Fortunately, I have very sensitive skin and I am afraid to make things worse and to bring everything to another level. My unbelievably light skin is another problem. With the pills, you have to absolutely use a UV protection in the form of a day cream or so and when I think that I get so quickly sunburn I do not know if Accutane at is so ideal. But is worth it anyway!

If this is how the Cleveland arena battle ends, and it could well be, it’s a truly incredible result — and one that drives home my longstanding worry about “community benefits agreements”: It makes it relatively easy for a team owner (or, in this case, a local government) to neutralize public concern over a subsidy deal by buying off whatever community groups are spearheading opposition. (For the Brooklyn Nets, it was even simpler: Fund the creation of your own friendly community groups, then cut a deal with them.) It’s nice that GCC extracted something from the county that will actually benefit Cleveland citizens more than arena renovations, I suppose, which wouldn’t have happened without the referendum drive. On the other hand, yeah, democracy sounded like a nice idea for a minute there.

Share this post:

6 comments on “Cavs subsidy foes scrap petitions, say “never mind, if we get crisis centers it’s all good”

  1. I’m going to propose that the moral of the story is:

    Community Benefits Arrangements are a fundamentally flawed idea, because they can easily turn into accepting anything, no matter how insignificant, and saying “we obtained progress.”

    And by the same token, genuine opponents of stadium subsidies should just stay away from groups that want a CBA, no matter what other rhetoric those groups may employ. Sorry to any CBA-pursuing organization that might be principled, brave, etc. Greater Cleveland Congregations took whatever trust you might deserve and–just like they did with our petitions–stuffed it down an industrial shredder.

  2. When this GCC first appeared and even followed Gilbert to Detroit to protest , I called them out as crooks. Guess I was right. This is the reason the cost of government is so high. Anyone who can mobilize out of work brainwashed fools can extort the political establishment at every level just as Jessy Jackson has.

  3. Gilbert’s statement that he wouldn’t move the team didn’t sooth any Cleveland fans. That’s what Art Modell said in 1994 and in 1995 he moved the team.
    These guys basically overplayed their hand. Once Gilbert called their bluff they were risking the ire of Cleveland sports fans, and Cleveland is a hard core sports town. If it was thought for a minute that these guys put the future of the one team that’s won a title in a half of a century than their personal safety would have been at risk.

  4. they better make sure they get their wishes built first or it might just be two buildings built with what was left over.

    When the Philadelphia Art Museum built, it a main building with 2 wings the lead designer and leading the construction, started building the 2 wings first.

    because if the city of Philadelphia cut back on the money, then Philadelphia would have 2 Art Museums

  5. When Gilbert says ” I will never move the Cavs out of Cleveland”, does he mean the Cavs will never move or he will not personally be moving any of their equipment himself?

Comments are closed.