Looks like we’re not the only ones complaining about the wacky renderings of the Texas Rangers‘ planned new publicly subsidized stadium, as some members of the Arlington City Council griped about them at their meeting last night. Specifically:
- Councilmember Robert Shepard: “When I saw the slide of Lucas Oil Stadium [in Indianapolis], I thought, ‘Oh, no, that looks like a field house.”
- Councilmember Charlie Parker: “This looks very much like our library that we’re building. There’s a lot of glass. It looks like you hit a home run with your design on the inside, but on the outside it seems that it is wanting for some other details.”
- Councilmember Victoria Farrar-Myers: “It looks like a field house. If that’s what we’re going for, then perhaps we’ve hit it. I’ve just seen some of the other ballparks, and quite frankly, this looks like a cold place to me.”
I’m honestly not quite sure what they’re complaining about here — field houses are cold-looking compared to baseball stadiums? — and also don’t really think anyone cares much about what stadiums look like from the outside so much as what they look like when you’re inside watching a game. (Quick, what does the outside of Fenway Park look like?) Maybe by “shed” they just mean that it’s squared-off, but that’s going to be the case for just about any stadium with a retractable roof, and a retractable roof that allows for air-conditioning is the whole reason the Rangers are building this stadium, so what did they expect?
The Rangers also released a fan survey about the ballpark experience yesterday, and the Dallas Morning News noted that in included the finding that “the No.1 thing fans said they liked about Globe Life Park was the in-game entertainment. The game itself finished second.” Which either means that modern sports fans would rather watch Kiss Cams than the game on the field, or that they’d rather watch Kiss Cams than the Rangers finish 4th, which is maybe a more reasonable proposition.