Sacramento Bee says city must “hold line” on MLS subsidies by providing MLS subsidies

Back during the Kings arena debate, the Sacramento Bee had a pretty consistently terrible record of being a booster for spending public money on the project, and never mind what the actual numbers showed about whether it would be worth it. So it was encouraging to see this editorial yesterday about the city’s proposed MLS stadium:

Sacramento City Council must hold the line on public money for MLS stadium
One big draw about the proposed Sacramento soccer stadium is that it doesn’t call for a large, direct taxpayer subsidy.

That is a line that shouldn’t be crossed as city officials and Republic FC owners try to beef up their bid for a Major League Soccer franchise.

Now that’s more like it! The team owners promised to build a stadium themselves, and City Hall shouldn’t let them back down on that just because MLS is withholding a franchise in hopes that the ownership group can come up with more cash. (Their cash, new investors’ cash, the public’s cash, MLS seems pretty agnostic on which they prefer.) This is good stuff, what does the next paragraph say?

Mayor Darrell Steinberg is on the money: It could make sense for City Hall to reduce or defer some building fees, to donate land for a training facility, to give the team the revenue from new digital billboards, or to help with roads, sewers and other infrastructure near the stadium.

(DEEP SIGH)

Let’s say it all together: MONEY IS MONEY, SPORTS TEAM OWNERS DON’T CARE HOW THEY GET IT. If very rich dude Kevin Nagle can get a pile of tax or fee breaks or free land or a pile of billboard revenue that would otherwise go into city coffers, that’s going to be just as fine with him as getting city checks with “4 STADM BLDG” written in the memo field. To pretend there is any moral or fiscal difference is, well, the kind of thing you do when you’re a mayor and want to propose a sports team subsidy but don’t want it to look like one. Or if you’re a newspaper that wants to do the same, I suppose, but you’d think their copy editing department might have balked at using “hold the line” to describe it — if the Bee still has a copy editing department, that is.


2 comments on “Sacramento Bee says city must “hold line” on MLS subsidies by providing MLS subsidies

  1. One fact that keeps being overlooked is that the city has already approved a financing plan that includes a public contribution of $46 million for infrastructure. (http://sacramento.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=21&event_id=2724&meta_id=452589 see last page)

    Much of that has already been spent building roads, lighting, utilities, and other improvments for the site.

  2. But wait, why should citizens let demands for massive subsidies derail a stadium plan which is underpinned by it’s lack of need for massive subsidies?

    Aren’t we just letting massive subsidy requirements get in the way of a project that doesn’t require them? We have to take a look at the big picture here, surely…