FC Cincinnati won its stadium vote thanks to dodgy campaign contributions

F.C. Cincinnati, you will recall, is getting $63.8 million in public subsidies thanks to a 5-4 vote of the city council last month, one that was held as an emergency measure so that regular citizens couldn’t overturn it in a public vote. And that key fifth vote, it turns out, is only in office thanks to a narrow winning margin helped along by $73,000 in campaign contributions from questionable sources:

It’s fair to say Republican Jeff Pastor’s questionable $54,600 personal campaign loan and $18,500 in “dark money” were likely good enough for 223 votes in last year’s City Council election. That was the slim margin the rookie candidate defeated Democrat Michelle Dillingham, whose 10th-place finish kept her off Council.

Questions are swirling about where Pastor got the money to loan to his campaign and whether a “dark money” nonprofit obeyed the rules when it electioneered for a candidate. That’s not to mention Pastor’s bizarre decision to pass out five-figure checks to churches during the campaign – money supposedly from his day-job boss Charlie Shor’s epilepsy foundation.

The story, as far as I can tell, is that Pastor loaned money to his own campaign at the same time as his boss loaned him money for a home mortgage, while also accepting that $18,500 from a Super PAC that doesn’t disclose its donors. None of that is necessarily illegal, but not keeping track of how he raised the money or spent it is — and Pastor’s campaign records didn’t bother to include any expense information.

Now, no one is suggesting that F.C. Cincinnati had anything to do with the dodgy campaign funds — I mean, they could theoretically be the Super PAC donors (so could me or you or Sheldon Adelson), but that would have taken a remarkable degree of foresight to realize he’d be their key stadium vote five months later. But it does mean that, but for some petty breakage of campaign finance law, Cincinnatians might today not have a new soccer stadium in the works, and still have $63.8 million. But at least now they have a shot at soon watching the glory of MLS soccer in the flesh!


5 comments on “FC Cincinnati won its stadium vote thanks to dodgy campaign contributions

  1. “Does MLS still suck A**”?

    Now that’s an investigative journalism headline everyone should be able to get behind….

    This example of campaign “financing” does help explain why campaign finance laws tend toward the torturous… a lending money to b, then b lending money to c, then c lending money to a 6′ tall skin tag covered in cat hair, then the skin tag lending money back to a for his mistress’s malibu beach house mortgage etc. etc.

    The fact that Rudy Guiliani doesn’t understand something doesn’t make it wrong I guess is the broader point…

  2. I almost linked directly to that incredible tweeted Galaxy footage, but figured it might need some context for non-soccer fans.

  3. Cincinnati is to sports subsidies as Florida is to strange, “Man arrested when X….” stories.

  4. FTC/FBI Announces Refunds To Scam Victims

    The Federal Trade Commission today announced a refund claim process in its case against Online Transactions. All consumers/US citizens who are victim of fraud, who send out money for the service that was not rendered and those who receive fake service instead of the real product/services that was paid for within united states and outside united State area between 2005 to date, are eligible to apply for a refund.

    The refund administrator for this matter, will process the claim forms. To apply for a refund, contact us Via Email: ftcaffairs@hotmail.com and ftcaffairs@gmx.us
    Consumers who would like instant massages can send text massage to 206-629-2784.