Brazil’s World Cup spending could set record for least bang for buck

Last week I interviewed Holy Cross economist Victor Matheson for my article on why the World Cup is a massive money suck that doesn’t return measurable economic benefits; this weekend, Matheson himself has an article up at FiveThirtyEight analyzing which Cup-hosting nations are getting the worst back for their stadium buck, and the unfortunate champion is Brazil:

An initial estimate for Brazil shows a projected SUI [stadium use index, or pro-rated number of capacity crowds per year] that would be among the lowest of recent hosts, with stadiums in Brasília, Manaus, and Cuiabá among the least-used stadiums from any recent World Cup. This poor stadium usage, combined with the highest nominal stadium construction costs of any World Cup, leads to a projected record-high FCI [fan cost index] of over $1,000 of stadium construction costs per fan in attendance in four years.

But really, who can put a price on providing your richest, whitest citizens the ability to go watch international soccer?

The silver lining, Matheson notes, such as it is, is that Russia is already looking to spend $7 billion on stadiums for the 2018 World Cup, a number that will surely rise. And the 2022 Cup is currently scheduled for Qatar, where money (and human life) is no object. So Brazil could end up only holding the record for most money thrown down a hole for four years, or at least eight. Order those “Brazil Stadium Spending World Champions” commemorative t-shirts while you can!

São Paulo staircase wobbles under fans, while VIPs get firmer footing

Remember the staircase into the new World Cup stadium in São Paulo that is made out of scaffolding and looks like it could fall down at any second? It hasn’t fallen down (yet), but it sure does wobble a lot:

There’s a separate staircase a short distance away, but it’s for VIPs so most fans can’t use it.

That’s about as good a metaphor for Brazil’s World Cup stadium spree as any. Unless it’s the $300 million, 42,000-seat stadium they built in a city with no pro soccer team and where one-quarter of the population has no running water. That’s pretty good too.

U.S. defeats Ghana at stadium that cost almost entire budget for regional improvements

Deadspin is reviving its epic “Why Your Stadium Sucks” series for the World Cup (as, naturally, “Why Your World Cup Stadium Sucks”), and yesterday’s entry on Natal’s Arena das Dunas, where the U.S. took on Ghana in their opening match, is worth quoting at length. Not because the Natal stadium has been one of the most egregious examples of construction overruns and horrible safety standards — not a single worker was killed building it! — but because it’s so typical:

Imagine you live in a city on the cusp of becoming a major regional hub. (Put your hand down, Cleveland.) Your country’s economy as a whole is humming along, local industries are propelling an influx of domestic and international migrants, and your hometown has just been selected as a host city for the World Cup. Then you get promised new hospitals! And a light rail system! And boy, things are really looking up for you, aren’t they?

But then the hospital never gets built, and the light rail system never materializes, and that undulating, starchitect-designed soccer stadium that can seat 42,000 fans in a city where the major club team draws, oh, about 5,000 people for big matches ended up costing $400m, or about a third of the promised $1.3b in regional improvements. (Almost half of that billion-and-change was never even obligated, which should either make you feel better because, hey, it was never coming here anyway, or significantly worse since, fuck, the city fathers almost flushed their entire bankroll on one stadium.)

About 400 people demonstrated outside the stadium during yesterday’s match, some burning FIFA flags, others American flags. I guess because the U.S. invented spending way too much on sports stadiums? Though then really somebody should have burned a maple leaf, for historical accuracy.

Brazil prepares for World Cup opener by throwing tarps over everything, hoping no one notices

The World Cup starts today, with host Brazil facing off against Croatia at 4 pm Eastern in the brand new Arena Corinthians in São Paulo. And how’s it going with the behind-schedule stadium? Great, if by “great” you mean “all the scaffolding is now covered by brightly-colored tarps”:

Meanwhile, Brazil’s stadium built in isolated Manaus in the middle of the Amazon rainforest is a sandy mess two days before it’s set to open with Italy vs. England, widespread protests continue against the estimated $14 billion the government is spending on hosting the World Cup, and John Oliver’s video on how horrifically corrupt FIFA is has three million hits on YouTube. I can’t wait to see how the World Cup announcers deal with all this on today’s broadcast — my guess is they’ll mumble something really fast and hope that it’s drowned out by caxirolas.

Entire world wakes up, realizes World Cup and Olympics are stupid

I don’t know exactly what tipping point we reached last week, but it appears that the entire planet came to a mass realization that mega-events like the World Cup and the Olympics, far from being massive revenue generators for host cities, are gigantic money pits that any public official should run screaming from as fast as possible. Witness, all within the past seven days:

No, it doesn’t mean that the World Cup and Olympics are now defunct, and will be replaced by one of those sporting events that involves everyone batting a giant ball into the air. But suddenly lots and lots of people are saying aloud that these mega-events tend toward being terrible catastrophes for the locales tabbed to host them, which isn’t a new concept, but isn’t usually discussed quite so widely. Though, of course, a few months ago people were actually interested in Russian human rights abuses against lesbians and gays, until they actually started playing sports and there was curling to watch, so maybe this is just the usual “the games haven’t started, we’re bored and have nothing to report on” run-up that will be completely forgotten later on.

Five weeks before World Cup, Brazil’s stadium worker death toll hits 8

The opening game of the 2014 World Cup is five weeks from yesterday, and … seriously? Again?

A worker at a World Cup stadium in Brazil died Thursday in an electrical accident, temporarily interrupting construction at one of the most-delayed venues only five weeks before the soccer tournament.

Rosenil Moraes, head of emergency services in the western state of Mato Grosso, said the construction worker received an electric shock at the site of Arena Pantanal in the wetlands city of Cuiaba. He died more than half an hour later of a cardiorespiratory arrest. Officials were not clear on what caused the accident.

That makes eight deaths so far of workers on World Cup venues, which actually could be a lot worse, considering the projections that 4,000 workers will die building facilities for Qatar’s 2022 World Cup. Not that eight deaths is a good thing.

The Brazilian government insists that all World Cup stadiums will open on schedule, because what else are they going to say? “Hey, at least this time it didn’t catch fire“?

FIFA says Brazil stadiums will be ready for World Cup, because alternative is unthinkable

Hey, how’re things going with Brazil’s $3.3 billion in death-plagued World Cup stadium projects, with the opening game just seven weeks away? Very, very poorly, though World Cup officials are still putting up a brave front:

“There is not a single minute we can waste because there is still a lot of work to do to,” [FIFA Secretary General Jerome] Valcke said after checking the construction work at the Itaquerao. “We are running against time. But, yes, the stadium will host the opening game and, yes, we will organize the opening game and all the other games in this stadium.”

Valcke also noted “potential issues” with two other stadiums in Curitiba and Porto Alegre, but insists that everything will be fine in time for the opening, because, well, it has to be? And there’s no way any more workers are going to fall to their deaths and delay construction, because that already just happened last month, and anyway, death always comes in sevens.

Judge halts stadium construction in Brazil after worker falls to death

I’ve been trying to decide how often to report on Brazil’s $3.3 billion World Cup stadium-building frenzy — life is short, and there’s been so much other craziness to cover — but I think a judge halting construction work after a worker fell to his death certainly qualifies:

Marcleudo de Melo Ferreira, 22, died Saturday after falling while helping install diamond shaped panels to the latticework of steel girders that form part of the stadium roof. Dozens of laborers were balanced on the girders as they worked. When complete, the panels on the roof are meant to resemble snake scales…

It was the second death at the Arena Amazonia this year and the third at a World Cup venue in less than a month.

A few hours after Saturday’s death, another worker died of a heart attack while paving an area outside the venue in Manaus.

Two workers were killed when a crane collapsed on Nov. 27 as it was hoisting a 500-ton piece of roofing at the Sao Paulo stadium that will host the World Cup opener. Last year, a worker died at the construction site of the stadium in the nation’s capital, Brasilia.

The first death at the Arena da Amazonia happened in March. Another worker died in April at the new Palmeiras stadium, which may be used for teams training in Sao Paulo.

Construction deaths are sadly not all that uncommon, but the rush to complete six new stadiums for next summer’s World Cup (and accompanying protests) has highlighted some of the problems of building on a tight timetable. Already none of new venues will be ready by the end of the year as planned; they’re still all expected to open in time for the actual World Cup in June, but it’s starting to get a bit dicey, especially now that construction workers at the stadium in Curitiba, the stadium furthest behind schedule, have gone on strike over late pay.

But hey, you can’t put a price on the free publicity from a World Cup, right?

Post-Thanksgivukkah stadium news roundup: Cubs beer sales, World Cup crane collapse, Vikings steel imbroglio

So it’s Thanksgivukkah+1, meaning that most of you are either sleeping off turkey latke comas or looking for Black Friday deals on smartphone-enabled Furbies. But there might be somebody sitting in an otherwise-empty office today scouring the web for things to read, so what to do? I know — bullet points, to cover some items that slipping through the cracks while we were focused on more urgent (or at least more bizarre) matters:

  • Chicago alderman Tom Tunney, the sometimes-nemesis of Cubs owner Tom Ricketts’ Wrigley Field renovation plans, has proposed a new “sports venue plaza liquor license” that would allow any sports stadium with a capacity of 30,000 or more — in other words, the Cubs, White Sox, or Bears — to sell alcohol in adjacent pedestrian plazas. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing or anything — given Wrigley’s small footprint, it wouldn’t hurt to get some of the beer-buying activity out of the baseball-watching part of the building — but it is a concession to the team, just as the Boston Red Sox‘ ability to use Yawkey Way for food sales is — and at the very least something you’d think the city could trade off with Ricketts in exchange for, say, not putting up illuminated ad archways over city streets. It also probably won’t make local bars too happy that Cubs fans will have more places to drink inside the park, but them’s the breaks.
  • Brazil’s much-beleaguered World Cup preparations got even more beleaguered on Wednesday when a crane collapsed at a stadium under construction in São Paolo, killing two workers and likely delaying the stadium’s opening until at least February. The World Cup doesn’t start until June, but still, the crane accident is only likely to exacerbate the cost overruns that have many Brazilians wondering why the hell anybody would want to host a World Cup anyway?
  • Construction is about to begin on the new $1 billion Minnesota Vikings stadium, and former state representative who Tom Rukavina is upset that the structural steel will be imported from Europe instead of brought in from Minnesota’s Iron Range, as required “to the extent practicable” by a provision that Rukavina inserted in the stadium bill. Only problem: The Iron Range doesn’t actually directly produce structural steel. Anyway, the Gov. Mark Dayton has promised that Minnesota firms will be on the job fabricating parts from the steel, so everyone can rest easy about the project. Except for, you know, all the money it’s costing Minnesota taxpayers to create a few steel-fabricating jobs.

And that’s enough for now — if you really want to read Marcos Breton’s latest puff piece talking about how awesome the Sacramento Kings arena will be for downtown, do it on your own time. See you Monday.

Brazilian judge suggests turning World Cup stadium into prison facility

Remember how Brazil is building $3.3 billion in stadiums for next year’s World Cup, including some in cities that don’t even have soccer teams? Apparently one of them, a $275 million facility in the city of Manaus, only has four World Cup matches total scheduled, after which nobody knows what to do with it — or nobody did know, until a Brazilian judge had a brainstorm:

Alvaro Corado, spokesman for the Amazonas state court system, told The Associated Press Tuesday that Judge Sabino Marques had proposed a novel idea.

“He would, perhaps, suggest to the government of the state of Amazonas that the stadium be used as a processing center for prisoners after the World Cup,” Corado said, quoting Marques.

Yes, a “novel idea.” Because that’s not going to bring up any uncomfortable associations at all.

Anyway, it’s just a suggestion, but one that helps indicate what a train wreck the 2014 World Cup is shaping up to be. Though at least eight years later Brazil will be able to point at the 2022 World Cup and say that at least its white elephant stadiums weren’t built by indentured servants.