“It was like someone was standing with a bullhorn and aiming it into my condo,” said Katie Miller, who lives about two blocks from the ballpark near Seminary and Cornelia avenues. “You could hear everything. Every single word.”…
[Cubs spokesperson Julian Green] said the team was redirecting two of the larger speakers on the left-field video board Monday to address the sound issues outside the park. … Green said the current setup will not be the permanent arrangement. Speakers in the grandstand eventually will be replaced during a later phase of the ballpark renovation project.
It will all get better eventually, presumably. (The Wrigley renovations are even supposed to add an entire bathroom once they’re complete.) Except for that video board, which is never going to get better ever.
That new video board in left field, which from certain angles looked almost bigger than the stadium itself (and from other angles didn’t look much smaller)!Fans peeing in cups in the corridor because the men’s room lines were half an hour long!
The tarps and the video board were expected; the peeing in cups less so, and frankly hard to understand, given that the Cubs sold 5,000 fewer tickets than usual thanks to the bleachers being closed for construction. (I guess the bleacher restrooms were closed as well, but still.) Maybe the Cubs were just trying to get all of the awfulness out of the way early in the season — they also got shut out 3-0. Everybody will be peeing in the right place once Kris Bryant is allowed to arrive!
Good news for Chicago Cubs owner Tom Ricketts, at last! A judge has refused to issue an injunction against the giant video boards the team is putting up atop the Wrigley Field bleachers, meaning the team can keep building them even if it blocks the views from neighboring rooftops.
That’s got to be a relief from the incessant run of bad press that the Wrigley renovations have been generating in the runup to the Cubs’ home opener on Sunday, and Ricketts can now sit back and rest easy that—
The first photos of the newly installed first-ever electronic video board for Wrigley Field are in, and it is just as big and obtrusive as you might have feared, and that’s even before it’s been turned on:
Let’s compare that with what the Cubs ownership said the board was going to look like:
Even allowing for different perspectives, that looks a lot bigger than the renderings that the Cubs released. (Compare it to the size of the manual scoreboard in center field.) The size is set in the landmarks approval that the Cubs received, so what looks most likely is that somebody was doing some hanky panky here with the initial renderings. But at least Cubs fans this year will have some nice video replays and commercials to distract them from the unholy mess that is the bleacher construction project, not to mention distract them from the Cubs.
Apologies for not posting any recent photos of the mess that is Wrigley Field as opening day approaches. Fortunately, Deadspin has us covered, with a full gallery of Wrigley bleachers destruct-o-porn courtesy of their readers. This is probably the wrecked-est looking one:
Dennis Culloton, a spokesman for [Cubs owner Tom] Ricketts, confirmed Wednesday evening that the project could very well bleed into a fifth offseason, one more than the original plan.
“That could still be the way it works out,” Culloton said of the original four-phase plan. “But it could take longer. Just take this winter for example, and we have found not only the problem with the weather but the water pipes that we had no control over. It could be four years, it could be five. It’s hard to say.”
On the bright side, the other renovations involve more off-the-field stuff — new bullpens, clubhouses, and luxury suites, and a new hotel next to the ballpark — so there’s at least hope that the games themselves won’t take place in a construction site in future seasons. And it looks like Wrigley will be playable for opening day this year, if you have a generous definition of playable. Still, for a team that’s openly trying to emulate the Boston Red Sox, this isn’t going like the phased renovation of Fenway Park did at all.
I’ve been surprised that no one has remarked that the playing field has been dangerously compromised. Both corner walls had extensive on-field scaffolding and braces in place to support the bricks. Also, extensive demolition took place, and replacement brickwork was laid, for about 100 feet in the right-field corner. New, mostly larger, doorways were carved out and re-bricked along the entire length of the wall. The on-field braces must come down, and new doors must be installed, before the field can be used at all…
Should the backing steel not be ready by April 5, there is an alternative, a temporary padded wall fronting the bracework could be built in short order, and be approved by MLB. Bottom line, the outfield and triangle work should not prevent an April 5 opening. The outfield fence may be incomplete, perhaps without baskets for awhile, but playable.
From the sound of it, then (and looks of it — there’s a slideshow on the Bleed Cubbie Blue site if you click through), Cubs opening day will go ahead as scheduled, but they’ll be playing in what will still be very much a construction site. I wouldn’t want to have to watch a game there then — I mean, I really wouldn’t want to have to watch a game in Chicago in April under any circumstances — but I’ll definitely be tuning in MLB.tv on April 5 to see if anyone pulls a Rodney McCray and sends bricks flying.
On Monday, the Cubs said the cold weather meant bleacher construction remains behind schedule, as work could not be done when temperatures dropped below 10 degrees. The left field bleachers are expected to be open by May 11, with the right field bleachers to be open in June, [Crane] Kenney said.
“We were hopeful for a warm winter. We did not get that,” Kenney said. “I think over the last nine days, we lost five days on the bleachers. We’d love to pick that time up by extending our work hours.”
By “extending our work hours,” Chicago Cubs president Kenney meant working outside the legal times of 8 am through 8 pm, which would require special permission from Mayor Rahm Emanuel. That being Mayor Rahm Emanuel who’s suddenly in the middle of an unexpectedly tight runoff election, and doesn’t want to piss off any voters unnecessarily by keeping them awake with late-night construction, so he said hell nah.
The Wrigley Field bleachers are not going to be ready for a while yet. But then, neither are the Cubs.
Yeah. I think you can see why I don’t always report on every piece of lawsuit news: There’s nothing stopping anyone from filing suit for any reason, so while it’s often interesting to know what’s being challenged in court (hey, you never know what might succeed), most of it ends up being just a lot of legal fees signifying nothing, and there are more important things going on. Today’s a slow news day, though, so a perfect day to play catchup, and give you all some information for filling out your restraining order brackets.
On May 8, 2012, at least nine owners met with Ricketts and Cubs executives. They said that demand for tickets inside Wrigley was declining because the rooftop businesses’ offered discounted tickets, sometimes through Groupon, and game-day tickets. The team asked them to “agree with the Cubs on setting coordinated, minimum ticket prices.”
Ricketts later threatened to block the views unless they agreed to a “price-fixing scheme, stating, ‘whatever you give us is in return for not being blocked.’ ”
The suit also includes charges of fraud and defamation, and probably puppy-kicking for good measure. All of which could conceivably be true, but it’s clear that the rooftop owners’ legal strategy has gone in record time from “threatening to sue but not ever actually doing so” to “throw everything at the wall at once and see what sticks.”