Field of Schemes
sports stadium news and analysis

  

This is an archived version of a Field of Schemes article. Comments on this page are closed. To find the current version of the article with updated comments, click here.

November 03, 2006

Giants, Jets: No NFL cash, no stadium

Apparently there is a point where they'll punt. The New York Giants and Jets intend to bail on their plans for a new $1.2 billion stadium if the NFL doesn't provide them with $300 million from its G-3 loan program, according to the Newark Star-Ledger. The NFL typically provides up to $150 million per team from the fund, but hasn't yet ruled on whether the Giants and Jets would be allowed to pool their G-3 money for a single stadium.

Writes the Star-Ledger's Matt Futterman: "The Giants and Jets have spent months studying how to finance their planned $1.2 billion stadium with or without the money from the NFL, but they have privately concluded the project will be too expensive and risky without the league's support" - in part because of rising labor and construction material costs that could end up adding as much as half a billion dollars to the initial $800 million estimate just over a year ago.

This latest ultimatum puts the NFL over a barrel: While the league wants the New Jersey stadium built, there's also growing pressure from teams that haven't received G-3 money to stop subsidizing their competitors with league revenues. (The G-3 program was first put in place in 1999, primarily to get NFL teams to stop relocating from big markets to small ones in search of lucrative stadium deals that helped the teams but hurt the league's national media marketability.) "The facts and figures seem to show that maybe there's been a disparate effect - that the beneficiaries are the teams seeking the G-3 and the players, while the others, in this case 30 or 31 teams, are penalized - not intentionally - by a major increase in the player aspect of it without proper credit given," Kansas City Chiefs owner Lamar Hunt told Futterman.

Hunt added that the league might seek concessions from the players' union in order to help fund the New Jersey project. NFLPA officials were apparently not available to laugh and laugh and laugh for the record.

COMMENTS

This can be great news the jets could wind up in queens at flushing meadow park. Who knows queens can have all three rhyming teams jets, mets and nets.

Posted by dan on November 3, 2006 11:23 PM

You sound really full of yourself.

Posted by Steve on November 4, 2006 11:33 AM

Why do I sound so full of myself. Ijust made a comment big deal. It's not my fault your in a crabby mood steve.

Posted by dan on November 4, 2006 05:06 PM

Flushing Meadows Park in Queens would be better off with a 30, 000 soccer stadium for an NYC MLS expansion team which could be used for 40 - 60 days a year from pro soccer games alone, plus all other events, than with a $1.5 billion NFL stadium.

Posted by Bertell Ollman on November 6, 2006 08:29 AM

Jeez, talk about setting the bar low...

Posted by Neil on November 6, 2006 08:39 AM

What's the over / under on the number of years the Jets & Giants will still actually be playing at the Meadowlands? 20 more years? 30 more? 40 more? Ad infinitum? Can we get Ladbrokes to get us an estimate?

Posted by Jonathan on November 6, 2006 09:26 AM

Fkushing meadow park is better off with a nfl team than a pro soccer team. The nfl generates more money than soccer. Enough with that stupid soccer stadium. If the deal in the meadowlands goes through either team can leave after 15 years .It is not a 99 years lease as everyone says it is. But Istill hope the deal falls apart between the jets and giants.

Posted by dan on November 6, 2006 05:59 PM

I heard dick codey telling mike and the dog yesterday on wfan that the stadium deal is done. It's time for ny to get the giants and jets to get rid of the ny in there name and for ny to try to get a team.

Posted by dan on November 10, 2006 06:57 PM

The Jets can keep the NY name but the Giants should get rid of the NY name.

Posted by Daniel F. on November 10, 2006 07:26 PM

The jets shouldn't be able to keep the ny name either.

Posted by dan on November 11, 2006 06:12 PM

Latest News Items

CONTACT US FOR AD RATES