Field of Schemes
sports stadium news and analysis

  

This is an archived version of a Field of Schemes article. Comments on this page are closed. To find the current version of the article with updated comments, click here.

November 19, 2006

Weekend update: Vikes plot to play off cities, and other stories

For some reason last week was a busy one in the stadium and arena world - trying to beat the Thanksgiving rush? Some of the items that evaded the FoS purse seine news net:

  • Minneapolis' Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission has hired a consultant to explore building a retractable-roofed stadium for the Vikings on the site of the Metrodome. While Vikings owner Zygi Wilf is so far noncommittal, the St. Paul Pioneer Press notes that "the team is happy to let Minneapolis and Anoka County compete" to build him a new $800 million stadium. Of course they are.
  • NBA commissioner David Stern has announced he's taking over the campaign for a new Sacramento Kings arena. "Although I have a full-time job, it dawned on me that there's really nothing more important than this," Stern told the Sacramento Bee. So far, the commissioner has phoned California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, and booked flights to Sacramento in December "for a series of as-yet unscheduled meetings," according to the Bee. Next up: Stern flips through Christmas catalogs from arena construction companies!
  • Sports Illustrated columnist Jonah Freedman lauds the owners of the New York Yankees, New York Mets, and Oakland A's for planning stadiums plans to build new stadiums for the Yankees, Mets and A's, respectively, and these new projects that will be "financed with a majority of funding from private sources" - ignoring the fact that the Mets and Yanks will be getting so much in hidden public subsidies that they could end up paying less for their "privately financed" stadiums than taxpayers, and that A's owner Lew Wolff has hinted that he'll seek major tax breaks as well. Sports owners have no better friends than journalists who don't read the fine print.
  • Though they've lined up a prospective owner for an NHL franchise (William "Boots" Del Biaggio III, who had previously sought to buy the Pittsburgh Penguins), officials of Anschutz Entertainment Group now say it's "highly unlikely" that they'll have an anchor tenant lined up for Kansas City's Sprint Center by the time it opens next fall. Told you so!
  • There was much activity on the Brooklyn Nets arena front, with the final environmental impact statement being issued and rumors flying about whether state assembly speaker Sheldon Silver, who killed the Manhattan Jets stadium, will delay or force changes to the Nets plan as well. For more details than anyone could possibly need, including plans for a lawsuit challenging the results of the FEIS, see Norman Oder's comprehensive Atlantic Yards Report blog.

COMMENTS

The nets arena will be built . It doesn't affect silvers district. Thats the only reason he rejected the jets stadium and also getting paid off by dolan.

Posted by dan on November 19, 2006 09:41 PM

According to the KC Star article, AEG quotes:�We�re the ones at risk here...the city ultimately has no risk in this building because the taxes they�ve raised are based on the car-rental tax and hotel tax."

Say what?!?!?!

Posted by Jonathan on November 20, 2006 10:14 AM

Look what happen to Copps Coliseum in Hamilton, Ontario. It was built years ago for an NHL team and no NHL team has moved there. Could be the same story for Kansas City's Sprint Center.

Posted by Daniel F. on November 20, 2006 06:52 PM

I am so Thankful that I haven't had to comment on Sacramento's situation. I think the pols here finally get the point.

Nothing quite says, "And the horse you rode in on!" quite like losing 81%-19%.

At this point, I think the only thing that can save the NBA in Milwaukee, Portland, Memphis, Seattle, Sacramento, and who knows how many other towns is revenue-sharing. Okay, the Knicks and Lakers will resist. Fine. It's either that, or go back to the days of 20 teams. I can live with that. I think revenue-sharing will be cheaper in the long run, but if the NBA wants to do it the old-fashioned way (threatening to move teams from communities that don't pay up), there will eventually be 20 teams.

Revenue sharing better happen sooner rather than later. If it doesn't, 20 teams, baby.

Posted by MikeM on November 27, 2006 05:00 PM

no comments

Posted by john on April 15, 2008 07:50 AM

Latest News Items

CONTACT US FOR AD RATES