Field of Schemes
sports stadium news and analysis

  

This is an archived version of a Field of Schemes article. Comments on this page are closed. To find the current version of the article with updated comments, click here.

June 16, 2009

Judge blocks "unapproved" Coyotes move to Hamilton

So much for a knock-down, drag-out fight over the NHL and antitrust law: Phoenix bankruptcy court judge Judge Redfield Baum rejected BlackBerry billionaire Jim Balsillie's $212 million bid for the Phoenix Coyotes, essentially on technical grounds, saying there wasn't enough time before Balsillie's June 29 deadline to evaluate if it was the best deal for creditors.

Baum did, though, appear to uphold the NHL's assertion that it has the right to control franchise movement (something current Coyotes owner Jerry Moyes claimed violates U.S. and Canadian antitrust law), writing in his opinion, "From the outside looking in, it appears that each of the leagues has not suffered or been materially damaged when one of its members made a quick and unapproved move as the then Baltimore Colts and San Diego Clippers did in 1984 and the Seattle Pilots did in 1970," and saying that for Moyes to try to use bankruptcy to break his contract with the NHL that the Coyotes will play in Phoenix would be "akin to a purchaser of a bankrupt franchise in a remote location asserting that it can be relocated far from its original agreed site to a highly valuable location, for example New York City’s Times Square."

Since an "unapproved" move is what Baum objected to, and the only people who've expressed any interest in buying the team and keeping it in place for the time being include three out-of-towners and a guy who won't even give his name, you have to wonder if this means an approved move could be in the cards. As Stephen Brunt writes in today's Globe and Mail:

There's a deal to be made — it's a buyer's market — though it's hard to imagine who would step forward to assume the long-term arena lease, and the inevitable, massive annual losses that would seem to entail.
All of which would suggest that one way or another, the NHL is going to have to work out a deal with someone: who will buy the team, pay lip service to the idea of making hockey work in Phoenix, and then relocate somewhere more palatable to the league's current interests.

Of course, it's also conceivable that Balsillie will file another lawsuit, or readjust his purchase offer, or try to buy the Toronto Maple Leafs so he can grant himself territorial rights to Hamilton. The guy brought down New York's state senate — anything is possible with him.

COMMENTS

Well, I guess Judge Baum doesn't have to worry about being reelected, does he? :-)

*sigh* Still, I knew there would be troubles with this hopelessly pointy-hired team from the vbery moment they announced the nickname would be "Coyotes". After all, the minor league club was the "Roadrunners" and we all know what happened to the Coyote who chased the Roadrunner, don't we?

Posted by Marty on June 16, 2009 11:36 AM

Well, Bettman and Co. will probably let the team move to Kansas City or Las Vegas this time next year. Sorry Phoenix, you've been screwed.

Posted by TheWiz on June 16, 2009 07:57 PM

The judge may not be aware of it, but the Pilots did go bankrupt and were moved to Milwaukee on short notice under new owners.

As for the Colts? They moved to Indianapolis because their stadium lease in Baltimore had expired and the state of Maryland was preparing to seize the club under the guise of eminent domain.

Posted by Chucky on June 20, 2009 08:57 PM

Jim Balsillie can't just buy the Toronto Maple Leafs alone. Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment owns all three together, the Leafs, Raptors and the Air Canada Centre. Balsillie would have to own the Raptors if he wants to buy the Maple Leafs.

Posted by Daniel Francis on June 21, 2009 12:54 AM

I take it your browser doesn't support the <joke> tag.

Posted by Neil on June 21, 2009 08:36 AM

The Seattle Pilots thing was long ago, like 40 years. Things change (sort of). Seems to me that deal was as much about a new stadium as anything else. The city did sue MLB, but got (eventually) a team before the elephantine legal process could come to completion. Of course, the city of Seattle didn't have a 30 year lease and a $700 million penalty fee going either.

As for the future....if Balsillie weren't trying to intrude on the Leaf's "territory", he'd have been welcomed with open arms. He could've put the team in Peapock, KY as long as there was a mulitmillion dollar arena there.

Posted by Marty on June 21, 2009 03:24 PM

Latest News Items

CONTACT US FOR AD RATES