Field of Schemes
sports stadium news and analysis

  

This is an archived version of a Field of Schemes article. Comments on this page are closed. To find the current version of the article with updated comments, click here.

August 01, 2011

As Islanders vote looms, finance board remains wild card

It's New York Islanders arena vote day in Nassau County, and ... there really isn't much to be added to what's been said already. Still, papers have gotta be published, so there's plenty of ink spilled today on the plan:

  • The Times has a long article that will be of interest to anyone who knows absolutely nothing about the arena deal and needs a primer. Key quote: "'It's a Catch-22,' [retired Nassau resident Bob Orosz] said. 'If it's passed, our taxes are going to go up. If it fails, our taxes are going to go up.'"
  • The Daily News has another editorial dissing the plan, its second in two weeks, which seems like a lot for a project that doesn't even affect most of the News' readers. Key quote: "Voters who care about fiscal sanity should go to the polls - and terminate the plan with extreme prejudice."
  • Newsday runs down the basics of the plan and what happens next. Key quote: "If the referendum is approved, it would next go before the 19-member Nassau County Legislature which would require a supermajority of 13 members, including at least two Democrats, to guarantee passage. NIFA also must approve the lease agreement and bonding."
  • The Wall Street Journal runs down the basics of the vote as well, with an extra helping of quotes from arena opponents. Key quote: "William Biamonte, the Democratic Commissioner of the Nassau Board of Elections, said voter turnout would likely be less than 10%, compared with up to 70% for a presidential election. 'Whatever the result, we won't be able to read any type of public intent from it,' Mr. Biamonte said."
  • One of the more in-depth articles on the Islanders plan, weirdly, is in the Montreal Gazette, where columnist Pat Hickey crunches the numbers and finds them wanting. Key quote: "The Islanders have tried to make the picture rosier by projecting $229 million in annual revenue for the new building. ... Consider these numbers: If the Islanders, who had the lowest attendance in the league last season at 11,059 per game, sell out all 41 games in a 17,500-seat arena with an average ticket price of $65 — which would be among the highest in the NHL — and every fan spent another $50 a game on beer, hotdogs and souvenirs, the total revenue would be a mere $82 million. It would take a lot of concerts and other events to make up the difference in the Islanders' projections."

The last poll, taken in mid-July, found that registered Nassau County voters opposed the plan, 51-36% — but as Biamonte noted, turnout is expected to be so low that this will be more a referendum on who's motivated to go to the polls than on what county voters actually think.

The more interesting wild card could be NIFA, which was appointed to oversee the near-bankrupt county's finances last winter, and which has already said it will take a hard look at the arena numbers before approving any deal. NIFA already rejected the county's overall budget last month, so clearly it's not afraid to make some tough calls. So however the vote goes today, the Islanders saga is far from over.

COMMENTS

No doubt, the Islanders' attendance has been awful. But there is (another) Catch-22 situation here. They've been unable to attract revenue streams and free agents due in part to the lousy arena. So the past few years, they've been in a rebuild, and they've been terrible. But in the seasons ending in 2002, 2003 and 2004, when they made the playoffs all three years, the average attendance was 14,548; 14,930; and 13,693. It is possible to put a lot more fannies in the seats in a new arena; it isn't a pipe dream.

Posted by John Kingston on August 1, 2011 02:58 PM

John K:

Since the numbers quoted were based on play in the existing arena, and with the same 'owner' in place, it seems it's possible to put more fannies in the seats of the old arena too.

If NC has $100m or so to spend (they don't...), they'd be far better off improving transit access to the present facility and sprucing it up.

Btw, free agents don't care how much revenue comes from a new building. They care about how much they get paid, having a good organization to play for and winning - the latter two things that Wang has been unable to build in NY.

Posted by John Bladen on August 1, 2011 04:36 PM

The Isles ain't drawing even $82M at the gate any time soon, even with a new arena. Only the Leafs and Habs drew that in '09-'10 (most recent year with available numbers). The Rangers would need a 30% increase to hit that. The Devils? Over 100%.

Posted by Ben Miller on August 1, 2011 05:35 PM

The Islanders are about 25% to 30% of the events at the Coliseum, and according to the deal, Isles will pay 11.5% of receipts on all arena money, not just Isles games.

If this vote is defeated, watch the politicians who opposed it run for cover when Wang tells the world he's looking for a new home or looking to sell. Most people in Nassau want the Isles; no one wants to put up any money. In 2015, expect an empty building that's waiting for the wrecking ball -- while taxpayers foot the bill.

Posted by DonK on August 1, 2011 09:23 PM

The islanders are heading to brooklyn or queens. Their days in nassau county are numbered.

Posted by dan on August 2, 2011 12:04 AM

Excellent article in the Montreal Gazette. Thanks for posting the link.
The results are in:

REFERENDUM QUESTION:

YES = 66,829 (43.05%)
NO = 88,389 (56.95%)


Posted by Tony S on August 2, 2011 03:15 AM

DonK:

You state that 25-30% of the events held at the arena are Islander games. Yet later on you state that if the Islanders leave the facility will face the wrecking ball.

Can you explain this? If 70% of the events at the arena are not Islander games, why would the county demolish it if they leave?

The 50 dates the Islanders don't use in such circumstances could be at least partially replaced with other revenue generators.

Posted by John Bladen on August 2, 2011 07:06 PM

Latest News Items

CONTACT US FOR AD RATES