Field of Schemes
sports stadium news and analysis

  

This is an archived version of a Field of Schemes article. Comments on this page are closed. To find the current version of the article with updated comments, click here.

March 20, 2012

Louisiana to pay $50m to keep Hornets, get out of old subsidy deal

The New Orleans Hornets have been a rumored relocation target ever since owner George Shinn bailed out in 2010 and left the team league-owned, but it looks like that's off the table now that the NBA and state of Louisiana have agreed to a ten-year lease extension that will keep the team in town at least through 2024. The details, such as can be determined from the truly execrable reporting turned in by local Louisiana news outlets:

  • The state will supply $50 million for renovations of the 13-year-old New Orleans Arena, funded mostly by capital bonds (repaid out of general state revenue, I believe), which should supply the Hornets with additional revenue from new ad boards and the like.
  • The Hornets will keep on getting $3.6 million a year in tax breaks that they received under the old deal.
  • The state will no longer have to kick in subsidies if Hornets ticket sales fall short of the team's desires, as was the case under the old lease. That could be as much as $6.8 million a year in savings over ten years, or it could be nothing, if the Hornets draw well enough that the subsidies wouldn't have kicked in.
  • The Hornets no longer get an out clause to break the lease if attendance doesn't reach certain benchmarks.

All in all, it looks like a relatively small price to pay to lock up the team for another ten years, though this is more in the "no worse than the old crappy lease" category than actually qualifying as a good lease. The deal is still tentative pending the Hornets' sale to local owners and approval of the tax breaks by the state legislature, but both of those are expected to occur soon. All of which likely means: No Hornets for you, Seattle.

COMMENTS

Neil
What happens if(when) nobody goes to the games next year or the year(s) thereafter?

Posted by Felton Suthon on March 20, 2012 12:46 PM

An excellent question. I can't tell from the press coverage whether the new lease starts next season or in 2014. Has anyone found any more informative coverage yet?

Posted by Neil deMause on March 20, 2012 01:43 PM

Okay, looks like AP is reporting that this lease would "supplant" the old one, which means no more subsidies for low attendance starting this summer.

Posted by Neil deMause on March 20, 2012 03:44 PM

A 13 year old arena needs renovations already? For a team that is barely making it in New Orleans? What a joke, let them leave!

Posted by Roger C. on March 20, 2012 05:17 PM

A 13 year old arena needs renovations already? For a team that is barely making it in New Orleans? What a joke, let them leave!

Posted by Roger C. on March 20, 2012 05:17 PM

Well it is an arena that was underwater a few years ago. But I doubt that's the reason it needs renovations. That said, this is definitely a decent upgrade in lease for the city, or at the very least not a downgrade. And more importantly it locks the team into town and keeps the vultures like Seattle, Anaheim and San Jose from circling... for now. Though they've all got various other targets they'll move on to like Memphis and Minnesota.

Posted by Dan on March 20, 2012 05:51 PM

Neil;

Do we know if the 'attendance' subsidies have been triggered in the past and, if so, how much the state has paid the Hornets for empty seats?

Posted by John Bladen on March 20, 2012 06:45 PM

No Hornets for Vancouver, BC as well. Now on to the Sacramento Kings for Vancouver.

Posted by Daniel Francis on March 25, 2012 05:56 AM

Latest News Items

CONTACT US FOR AD RATES