Well, now, isn’t this interesting: Thanks to errors in last December’s rushed Washington Nationals stadium bill – among other things, some tax money was pledged to two different purposes at once – the legislation is heading back to the D.C. council for amendments, which could lead to a reopening of debates on the project’s financing (80% public) and cost ($581 million and counting). Two of the new councilmembers who took office in January after the stadium vote, Kwame Brown and Vincent Gray, have expressed in interest in reopening discussion of building on a cheaper site near the Nats’ current home of RFK Stadium; while council chair Linda Cropp may try to block such a move on procedural grounds, MLB is apparently concerned enough to have polled prospective Nats buyers as to whether they would still bid as much for the team if the stadium site were shifted. It could be weeks or months before this is resolved, so stay tuned.
2 comments on “Nats stadium debate: It’s back!”
Comments are closed.


Soooo…… any word on the stadium project for the only team in the DC area to win a championship in the last 10 years, D.C. United?
I have not recently seen any news about a new SSS
for DC United. I know that team and city officials
have liked the idea of keeping a low profile on it
for the time being. To me, it will be very sad if
and when RFK Stadium is torn down. RFK Stadium has
great history and very impressive architecture!!!
It would be a huge loss! RFK Stadium is and
will always be the best!!!!