Brewers’ state-of-the-art clause could require $87m+ in fresh taxpayer subsidies

I wrote here 10 days ago:

The owners of the Milwaukee Brewers have commissioned a study of their stadium “needs” through 2040, even though their lease only runs through 2030. … Nobody seems to be suggesting that the public stadium district just inform the Brewers that if they want a new lease after 2030, they’ll have to pay for their own damn stadium upgrades, whoops, looks like I just did!

One thing I neglected to do at the time was to check on the Brewers’ lease — as the article I was citing also failed to do — to see what it says about future upgrade costs. And as it turns out, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports, the team’s original stadium deal contains a state-of-the-art clause (termed a “keeping up with the Joneses” clause by the Journal Sentinel) that requires Wisconsin’s stadium district to pay for any improvements that “can reasonably be said to fall within the ‘top’ twenty-five percent (25%) of all such facilities, when such facilities are ranked or rated according to the quality with which they are repaired and improved.”

This kind of clause was all the rage in the late ’90s, and is best remembered for the Cincinnati Bengals‘ clause requiring the public to install holographic replay systems, if they’re ever invented. A similar clause ended up allowing the St. Louis Rams to break their lease and move to Los Angeles, after a ruling that the city would have to spend $700 million on stadium upgrades to keep the then 18-year-old stadium “first class”; and the Tennessee Titans owners are currently seeking $300 million in public cash on the basis of a similar clause.

The Brewers owners’ ask is still being calculated: A March 2019 study by a team-hired construction firm identified $71.7 million in expenses over the next 20 years, but Brewers president of business operations Rick Schlesinger has said that the total cost could be more than the $87 million remaining in the public stadium district’s reserve fund. And while 2039 is past the time that the Brewers’ lease expires in 2030, the team has a 10-year lease extension option in its pocket — so rather than having to negotiate for fresh subsidies in exchange for extending their lease, the team owners can just re-up for a decade and say, “Keep the taxpayer checks flowing, please.”

The lesson, as always: If you are a public official working on a stadium deal, do not sign state-of-the-art clauses, they are a recipe for having to throw good money after bad. You have to wonder why Wisconsin officials agreed to this deal in the first place — though given that the deal was struck at 5 a.m. when Gov. Tommy Thompson personally arm-twisted a state senator into changing his vote, maybe you don’t have to wonder all that hard.

Other Recent Posts:

Share this post:

2 comments on “Brewers’ state-of-the-art clause could require $87m+ in fresh taxpayer subsidies

  1. “If you are a public official working on a stadium deal, do not sign state-of-the-art clauses, they are a recipe for having to throw good money after bad.”

    Why? Public officials love throwing good money after bad. It’s what they do.

  2. Professional sports franchise cartels are being too kind to municipal politicians.

    Why is it any sports league’s problem that no-one has invented holographic displays yet?

    It isn’t, and you can (not) take that to the bank.
    It’s high time team owners stopped agreeing to carry water for both politicians and tech companies. Get with the program people!

    I say the next round of no-cost to franchise owners stadium leases should include lease breaks and penalties if no-one invents holographic displays. Give the taxpayer some incentive to get on this whole holographic display thing. You haven’t invented holographic displays by year six of my next lease? I get to walk and you pay me $300m for my trouble. I mean, sure, I’ll already have borrowed at least half of that against my franchise to cover out of pocket payments to, um, suppliers, but hey. Come on.

    And those memory sharing devices like Trumbull suggested in Brainwave (1983 I think. Huh, we hadn’t even packed up the moving vans yet. Funny old days). Those are cool.

    Gotta find a way to include digital encryption so you can’t access the images without paying… and better yet can’t access your own memories of the 1971 Superbowl without paying again. Hey, IP is IP. You may remember it, but you don’t own the rights to replay it in your head. Remember that, peons.

Comments are closed.