Buffalo News says Bills stadium plan delay is meant to evade oversight, and that’s a good thing, a real good thing

You know things are going inauspiciously when an article begins like so:

Why is it taking so long? Buffalo Bills fans have been asking that question regarding one thing or another – be it winning a Super Bowl or finding a quarterback or firing Rex Ryan – for generations.

And now some are asking it again, as they wonder why negotiations between Bills owners Terry and Kim Pegula, Gov. Kathy Hochul and Erie County over building a new football stadium in Orchard Park have been quiet for weeks.

Umm, maybe? If past evidence is any guide, some Buffalo Bills fans who, living in New York state, are also New York state taxpayers may be wondering more “Why are we being asked to build a new stadium for the Bills exactly?” The last time anyone deigned to take a poll of Western New Yorkers, nearly half said taxpayers should contribute nothing to the cost of a new Bills stadium, so it’s possible this is not something that fans see in a “winning the Super Bowl” category of pure good.

But this is not that kind of article. Weirdly, after assigning weekly articles on the Bills stadium to an odd assortment of sportswriters plus their Albany correspondent, the Buffalo News instead asked their Washington, D.C. correspondent, Jerry Zremski, to look into it this time. And what he found — after the requisite “I’m a non-sportswriter writing about sports, I’m gonna throw in some sportsy references to show that I know who Rex Ryan is” — is that the delay in putting forward a Bills stadium bill is likely an intentional gambit to keep the state legislature from looking too hard at the taxpayer costs:

“It’s basic politics/government: The longer it’s out there, the more opportunities there are to poke holes and have it fail,” said one longtime Buffalo political insider…

Hochul unveiled her proposed $216 billion budget on Jan. 18, but there was no stadium deal in it.

Let’s imagine what could have happened, though, if there had been. Then every state legislator, including New York City’s most progressive progressives, would have had more than two months to think about – and tear into – the idea of the state subsidizing a fracking billionaire and his wife and a large share of the costs of their $1.4 billion football stadium for the upstate governor’s hometown team.

None of this should come as a surprise, or as something requiring the services of a “longtime Buffalo political insider.” (Hey, Jerry, most newspaper ethics guidelines say that anonymous sources shouldn’t be used for opinion or speculation!) Especially given that the News’s own Albany correspondent reported state legislators saying it on the record two months ago.

The really weird part, though, is that Zremski reports this less as a problem than as savvy political strategy: Ha ha, don’t want those “progressive progressives” to have a chance to think about things! The other gubernatorial candidates and downstate news outlets have hardly reported on the Bills stadium at all, good going, Gov. Hochul! It’s possible that he is trying to present this with the most subtle helping of sideeye — he does, after all, get in that the Pegulas are billionaires (or only Terry Pegula is, while Kim Pegula is just “his wife”? has Zremski gotten a peek at their prenup?). But the overall tone remains one of reassurance that Albany behind-closed-doors-politics-as-usual will result in a billion-dollar subsidy to NFL billionaires, don’t you worry, especially when he gets to his conclusion:

And privately, sources in both Albany and Buffalo said last week that they’re confident that a deal will emerge in the coming weeks.

So yes, there’s still time to get a deal done, and plenty of it. After all, March 31 is way more than 13 seconds away.

Noooo, you’re not supposed to use sportsy references to remind fans of terrible things they want to forget! Damn, he was so close to nailing it, too.

Other Recent Posts:

Share this post:

4 comments on “Buffalo News says Bills stadium plan delay is meant to evade oversight, and that’s a good thing, a real good thing

  1. sports journalism is a little different, being more of a homer is tolerated in sports journalism. I remember when I was in the press box (for Stats in the 80s/90s) it was free admission, free food, and the team gave you stats and quotes that helped you write the article. Of course journalists can be biased after a while, I think that was the point. So it’s no surprise that the journalists have already decided that a new stadium is needed (no discussion needed), of course govt needs to pay most of it, and it’s just a matter of how the governor can get this done without costing the BIlls too much.

    1. Exactly Tom. Which is why I want non sports writers to be the ones on the stadium stories.

  2. I figured this will happen. Hochul had to know state and local pols would seek quid pro quo requests in exchange for supporting a Bills subsidy. It makes me wonder if the Pegulas have the audacity to seek a second helping of handouts when it comes to the Sabres.

    https://www.uticaod.com/story/news/2022/03/15/buffalo-bills-equity-investment-group-seeking-money-baseball/7038671001/

    https://theathletic.com/2568461/2021/05/05/sabres-arena-in-pictures-trouble-spots-areas-of-opportunity-and-how-to-improve-the-fan-experience-in-buffalo/

    1. Hey, if one is good two has got to be better… And you can always close a few schools, police & fire stations or eliminate school lunch programs if you need to pay for it.

Comments are closed.