Friday roundup: Orioles owners get millions from state for no reason at all, plus whose relatives to hire as stadium lobbyists

Happy Friday! Just a heads-up that I’m going to be traveling some in the next 2-3 weeks, so there may be days when posts happen at weird hours or not at all. (Next week’s Friday Roundup stands an excellent chance of being a Saturday Roundup, for example.) On the bright side, I plan on picking up and mailing the Vaportecture prints before I hit the road, so those of you who’ve donated to the site will have something to entertain you on otherwise FoS-less mornings.

That’s all in the future, though, so let’s see what the recent past has in store:

  • Here is a lovely story about how the Baltimore Orioles owners decided that the lease they signed agreeing to give 45% of revenues from baseball events to the state didn’t work for them anymore, and asked the state to let them keep all the proceeds from a recent Paul McCartney concert. And the state stadium authority said sure, fine, it’s only money, at least we’ll get sales taxes! No, really, that’s what Maryland Stadium Authority chair Thomas Kelso said: “It’s a great thing. We take no risk and we make 8% of the total amount of tickets sold.” Except the other way, the way that the team owners agreed to, was to provide 45% of the actual concert revenues — if I’m reverse engineering the math right, that’s $4.5 million that the state of Maryland just handed over to the Orioles management because they asked. Time for me to move to Maryland and start asking the state for free money, they’re just giving it away!
  • WTVF-TV in Nashville has looked at the list of lobbyists hired by the Tennessee Titans owners to push for their new $2 billion stadium plan that could get $1.2 billion in subsidies, and hey, check it out, it’s the wife of the chair of the state Senate Finance Committee and the daughter of the state’s Commissioner of Tourist Development! The TV station tracking down the finance committee chair and asked him if there were ethical concerns here, and he said “Ah, no” and “There are rules in place for our kind of relationship, and I follow all of them” and he surely doesn’t know why his wife landed a ton more lobbying contracts right after she married him, jeez, you journalists and your questions, get a life already!
  • Speaking of Nashville, were you wanting to read an op-ed in the Tennessean newspaper by Nashville Mayor John Cooper about how spending $1.2 billion on a Titans stadium won’t really cost taxpayers anything because otherwise the city would have to spend “tens of millions of dollars per year” on renovations and anyway sales and hotel taxes aren’t really “your” tax money so don’t worry about it? That’s what you want from your news outlets, right, turning over space to local elected officials for long press releases without any context or asking them any questions? No need to answer, consider it done!
  • And finally from the Protestant Vatican/Hot Chicken Capital, turns out there isn’t enough parking at Nashville S.C.‘s stadium and the team has stopped running shuttle buses and fans are having to walk home when they can’t get a rideshare. Clearly the team needs a new stadium, the old one isn’t fan-friendly and is … 11 days old? That’s practically a century in stadium years, bring on the bulldozers!
  • The Erie County legislature has approved the first $100 million of its $250 million in spending on a Buffalo Bills stadium, but hasn’t yet voted on the full memorandum of understanding. The Bills owners were only supposed to receive $75 million up front originally, but the legislature upped this to $100 million because, writes the Buffalo News paraphrasing county chair April Baskin, “it became more clear that putting money down toward the stadium now will free up millions more in the future to redirect toward other county priorities.” Buffalo News, have you met the Tennessean? I bet you guys would get along swimmingly.
  • New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft is spending $225 million of his own money on a renovation of his 20-year-old stadium, which will include “a new and enhanced lighthouse in the north endzone” and “a new fan-activation area on the lower plaza” and other things that maybe make sense if you are either a Patriots fan or a marketing executive. Such is the state of the world that we feel obligated to call this a good thing because Kraft didn’t ask the state of Massachusetts to pay for this, though given Kraft’s past experience this is almost certainly because the state of Massachusetts likely would have told him to go pound sand. (Yes, despite Massachusetts being one of those East Coast states without California-style voter referendum laws. I never said that the map of the Progressive movement explained everything!)
  • I hate linking to the New York Post because I don’t want to give them the clicks, but also I like dragging them in public, so: Here’s a New York Post article about how NBA teams are hiking ticket prices even while attendance is falling. The Post portrays this as either a savvy move to make up for falling revenues or maybe a risk of alienating already-alienated fans, but … maybe they got the causality backwards, and attendance is falling because ticket prices are going up, like microeconomics says is supposed to happen? Or, wait, hang on, the Post “calculated average ticket prices by dividing gate receipts by paid attendance,” so maybe this is just a sign that more casual NBA fans are staying home to watch on TV, leaving pricey-ticket buyers disporportionately in the seats? The Post is a terrible excuse for a newspaper, any and all basic logic errors are possible!
  • KSHB-TV in Kansas City wanted to know if building new stadiums for the Chiefs and Royals was a good idea, so they talked to team executives, a guy from the city’s downtown business council, two people at a moving company, two sports radio hosts, and me. Kansas City diner patrons should rightfully be feeling unrepresented right now.

Other Recent Posts:

Share this post:

16 comments on “Friday roundup: Orioles owners get millions from state for no reason at all, plus whose relatives to hire as stadium lobbyists

  1. The executive with the Royals that speaks of St. Louis not regretting building a stadium downtown – he’s referring to their move from Sportsman’s Park in 1966?

  2. Sorry to point out a problem. Massachusetts does have voter referendum laws. Here’s what is working it’s way on the November ballot. https://www.mass.gov/info-details/ballot-initiatives-filed-for-the-2022-biennial-statewide-election-proposed-laws-and-2024-biennial-statewide-election-proposed-constitutional-amendments

    Mr. Kraft passed up an opportunity to get a stadium paid for by the government in Hartford, to stay in Foxboro with state money limited road improvements around the stadium. Unusual for a sports owner. https://www.si.com/nfl/2017/01/23/nfl-new-england-patriots-abandoned-move-hartford-connecticut

    1. Sorry, should have said “without West Coast-style voter referendum laws,” will fix.

      As for Kraft, he also used the Hartford threat to get the NFL to start providing league money for stadiums, initially to only teams in the six largest markets. Care to guess which city was #6 at the time?

      1. Wait! Don’t tell me…

        Did the renovation money also cover “sports related entertainment options”, like the Orchid of Asia or whatever his preferred destination was?

        Enjoy your fun trip Neil (if it is meant to be a fun trip).

  3. Surely I can’t be the only one who thinks WTVF in Nashville needs to drop the V from it’s name?

    Wow. I sure looks to me like the Titans have some Hochul level self dealing going on in their lobbying department.

    Maybe we should all feel lucky that the team didn’t demand $50m in state money up front to hire the lobbyists to lobby the state for stadium subsidies…

  4. I’ve only purchased the NY Post to get the NYC Marathon results when I ran in it.

  5. KC is the perfect market for teams to exploit for new stadiums. You have 2 states that can vie for the team. It’s a small market and its not growing that much, so there’s always the threat to move to some trendy hip place.

    Over in Kansas, they have plenty of room in Village West for a new stadium. Makes sense for the Chiefs, Royals would probably have attendance issues that far west.

    1. But the Pittsburgh Penguins got arena money by threatening to move to Kansas City! Is it a dying market or a trendy hip place? Owners can’t claim it’s both! (Owners can totally claim it’s both.)

      1. “Owners can totally claim it’s both.”

        It’s a floor wax and a dessert topping!

        Enjoy your trip, Neil!

      2. KC had the new arena (which still without a tenet makes a boatload of money from concerts/events), back when the Penguins used them for leverage. I doubt any pro team today is clamoring to go there. Baseball economics might be shifting enough in the next decade to make the Royals want to bail for some place new. The region will do whatever it takes to keep the Chiefs.

        1. KC still has the new arena. Does the new-car smell really wear off that quickly?

          As for MLB, it seems like the most likely change to baseball economics will be more shared streaming revenue, which will mean market size will matter less, which means smaller cities like Kansas City would be in anything in better shape.

  6. I am so tired of these nothing stories knocking my team off the front pages. I mean, seriously, what do I have to do to get some coverage?

    I drive a ’97 Grand Voyager just for the media value of doing so (well, I mean, I have someone drive me around in it… or a likeness of me in it anyway).

    I mean, come on people! I had someone else build me a stadium with a third party’s money. What else do I have to do to get some attention?

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/13/sports/football/las-vegas-raiders.html

  7. I’ve wondered for years what that thing is in Gillette…a lighthouse! That makes sense in Foxboro.

    1. Any ships that wander off course as far as Foxborough badly need a lighthouse. If not a road atlas.

Comments are closed.