Friday roundup: The rich get richer, subsidies for me and not for thee, and other American truisms

This has been a week, so we’re going to get straight to the news. If you want to check out what I’ve been doing in my spare time, though (other than this website), you might want to play my text adventure game Improv: Origins, which just placed 4th (out of 18) in an interactive fiction competition. It has superheroes, socioeconomic commentary, and oh so many rubber bands…

Anyway, stadium news is what you came for, stadium news is what you get:

  • The Denver Broncossale to Walmart heir Rob Walton for $4.65 billion is expected to be approved by the NFL next week, in what would be a record price for a U.S. sports franchise. The Las Vegas Raiders are selling a minority stake in their team for a price that would value the whole team at $6.5 billion. While it shouldn’t escape notice that Walton is thought to be looking to get public money for a new stadium and Raiders owner Mark Davis already did, it’s also worth noting that pretty much every NFL team is soaring in value thanks largely to massive national TV contracts — so while “these dudes are filthy rich, they don’t need our money” is legit, “these dudes are getting filthy rich by building stadiums on the taxpayers’ dime” is only partly true, since it’s just one factor increasing the filth.
  • Americans for Prosperity is calling on Arlington Heights to pass an ordinance barring it from provide “corporate welfare” to the Chicago Bears, which is ironic to say the least given that Americans for Prosperity is a mouthpiece for the Koch brothers (well, the alive one, anyway), who have collected more than half a billion dollars in corporate welfare themselves. Though maybe it’ll pass, and one shouldn’t look strange bedfellows in the mouth, but nobody ever said one shouldn’t point out their hypocrisy.
  • This article claims that the $279.5 million in California state money that the Oakland A’s owners want for their Howard Terminal infrastructure funding is definitely going to be used for that, which Mayor Libby Schaaf already claimed last year, but I for one will wait till I see the receipts. Anyway, still lots more public money that needs to be found under sofa cushions before the project can be a reality.
  • Bexar County Judge Nelson Wolff says MLB’s new minor-league stadium requitements could cause San Antonio to lose the Missions if it doesn’t upgrade their ballpark, and it’s not worth renovations that could cost $5-10 million when you could build a whole new one for $75-150 million. I’ve read it three times, that what he said, you try to make sense of it.
  • The Baltimore Orioles‘ Camden Yards changed sports architecture (arguably for the better) and sports stadium funding (inarguably for the worse). That’s nothing new — it’s a large chunk of Chapter 1 of Field of Schemes — but if you want to read a whole lot more words to that effect, some of which are “But here we get to the crux: Camden Yards is not categorically salvific,” The Ringer has got you covered.
  • Rays president offers new stadium details” promises the St. Pete Catalyst headline, which the article reveals to be: “It is inappropriate for me to get into some of the confidential details of those discussions.” They really don’t make details the way they used to.
Share this post:

6 comments on “Friday roundup: The rich get richer, subsidies for me and not for thee, and other American truisms

  1. Don’t see ALL of the $279.5 million in California tax dollars (which I helped pay into!) going into the Howard Terminal boondoggle, because pedestrian bridges and vehicle overpasses don’t help “…facilitate enhanced FREIGHT..access” or provide “..upgrades to maintain the ports viability in the face of intense competition for international trade.” If the Port/Oakland try and pull a fast one and use all those funds for their ballpark fantasies I think a 5th lawsuit could easily be in the works. But agree Neil, even IF HT got all those funds still a HUGE gap in funding to fill.

  2. The Missions ballpark is way out in the west side of San Antonio, near the air force base, and not only is traffic a nightmare with minimal public transportation options, but the stadium is also just bare bones. That doesn’t excuse the whole “if you won’t build all these fancy things, we’ll just move” demands, however. Where the heck will you put a new stadium in San Antonio anyway?

  3. Well, I guess we now know that there are no basic competency (mathematical, economic or otherwise) that county judges have to pass before being eligible for the job.

  4. The San Antonio stadium’s official name is Nelson W. Wolff Municipal Stadium. Yikes! Apparently the judge has the final say in whatever happens in San Antonio.

  5. Might be a first for this website for someone to advocate the destruction of a stadium named after him!

Comments are closed.