Friday roundup: Reading the fine print on stadium and arena deals is a lost art

A note to all of you Field of Schemes supporters who signed up to receive the daily posts in email — I’ve been made aware of a glitch that may have been keeping some new members from getting the emails. This should now be fixed, but if you think you should be receiving emails but still aren’t, please contact me; if you think you shouldn’t be receiving emails but are, then really contact me. (And if you’re not receiving emails because you haven’t become a monthly patron but would like to, just sign up!)

And with that business out of the way, let’s move on to the real excitement: the week’s leftover stadium and arena news!

Other Recent Posts:

Share this post:

12 comments on “Friday roundup: Reading the fine print on stadium and arena deals is a lost art

  1. #LOLFisher

    From one of the linked articles…

    “the A’s are averaging 9600 fans per game in 2025”.

    Well, they might be averaging that many tickets sold when you include season ticket holders, but anyone looking at the stands during a game at their minor league stadium can tell that the numbers of butts in seats would start with a ‘6’ some days, and maybe even a ‘5’ on others.

    Who cares if the tickets are sold, right? Well, the owner should. Because people who bought tickets and neither use them nor give them away (to people they want to stop being friends with…) are not buying merch or spending at the concession stand.

    Or hurling obscenties at the clueless owner as he runs away from his customers.

    Anyone think MLB is happy with this overall “look”?

    1. On the other hand, pursuing our gracious host’s suggestion, “Dunk the Clown” nights sound like a perfectly appropriate side activity for a minor league ballpark…

    2. MLB is so embarrassed by Fisher’s act that his fellow owners elevated to their executive committee earlier this year.

      1. MLB owners may be bad at lots of things, but they’re pretty strong on class solidarity.

      2. “Elevated” may not be quite the correct term to use in this context. Think of some of the other names who have been named to that committee over the years.

  2. Detroit City for years was held up as an example of a fan-owned soccer club doing things “the right way,” and there was some truth to that idea (e.g. driving local fan support/engagement). But give these operations enough time, and they almost always end up with the exact same inner motivations as leagues and franchises operating under the model they publicly decry.

    1. You’re 100% right. They used to be the plucky little indie club (albeit with a million dollar budget). But once they no longer could play an entire season and leave the state of Michigan only twice or so, and once they couldn’t host like four playoff games to make their nut, they became like everyone else. They are now just as corporate

  3. Love this headline

    The $62m question: does a high school really need a professional-style stadium?

    A 10,000-seat arena for a school in Georgia with fewer than 2,000 students raises questions about America’s sporting and educational priorities

    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2025/aug/14/buford-goergia-phillip-beard-stadium

    1. Nice. It would be interesting to know what Buford’s infrastructure and social amenities are like… IE: how far below or above the state standards.

      Even in places where HS Football is a religion and they can fill 10-20k stadia, you still wonder if the share of the revenues going to the public coffers (if any…) are enough to pay the carrying costs on the facility, let alone earn the municipality back it’s investment.

      Of course, in cases where the schools fundraise and pay for the facilities themselves, hey, I’m all in on that… so long as it has nothing to do with tax dollars or student fees etc.

  4. What the Ohio General Assembly giveth, Ohio DOT could taketh away.

    https://www.cleveland.com/news/2025/08/new-cleveland-browns-stadium-would-interfere-with-airplane-traffic-state-aviation-officials-say.html

    1. A 231 foot high football stadium barely outside the runway protection zone of runway 28, what a great idea. Imagine landing on runway 28 in gusty snow squalls off Lake Erie and a hulking football stadium is appearing and dissappearing in blowing snow and fog slightly to your left. Cleveland’s lovely winter weather is a good reason not to allow obstacles anywhere near Hopkins Airport. Ardent Hills, Anika County and Arlington Heights and now Brook Park, all schemes to con gullible politicians into raiding public coffers to build playpens for greedy billionaires. Cleveland and Chicago should have built their current stadiums as domes, if you want to replace publicly funded 20 year old stadiums, pay for it yourself.

  5. “Manchester United are importing a sinister US tactic: public money for stadiums”

    It takes a progressive daily founded in Manchester to lay out what no legacy news site from Murica will dare say.

    https://www.theguardian.com/football/2025/aug/19/manchester-united-new-stadium-public-funding

Comments are closed.