Friday roundup: Rays blink on June 1 stadium deadline, Illinois residents don’t want to break the bank to keep Bears

Time to catch up on what else has been going on this week while we’ve been doing wall-to-wall Tampa Bay Rays coverage. But first, the latest in Tampa Bay Rays news!

  • With elected officials in Tampa still insisting on asking pesky questions about whether giving Rays owner Patrick Zalupski $2.1 billion or more in total stadium subsidies would leave the city and county with a budget shortfall if tax revenues fall short (or even if they’re just diverted from other uses), Rays execs finally blinked: CEO Ken Babby has backed away from his June 1 deadline for a deal, saying the team is now just “focused” on getting a “nonbinding” memorandum of understanding that would send a signal to the state that “the county, the city and the Rays are committed to this partnership.” (Zalupski added that even an MOU by June 1 isn’t absolutely necessary, but he wants one “real soon” thereafter, even if “it’s purely symbolic.”) Translation: Let’s get at least the state part of the deal done before Ron DeSantis leaves office, then we can come back and haggle over financial details for the city’s and county’s portions. It’s not clear if Tampa and Hillsborough County will be able to push for a less spendy MOU — or be willing to reject the plan entirely if they can’t — but score at least one point for elected officials refusing to fall for the two-minute warning.
  • A new poll shows that most Illinois residents oppose throwing a lot of state money at a Chicago Bears stadium to ensure the team doesn’t move to Indiana — or at least, it does if you include the 36.9% who want to allow the team to break their Soldier Field lease and build a new stadium in Illinois without any taxpayer funds, as well as those who want to force the Bears to keep playing there through 2033, are those even real options, this is a weird poll. Other poll findings: Opposition to funding most of a stadium’s cost with public money is consistent across the political spectrum, and Illinois residents outside the immediate Chicago vicinity don’t give a crap where the Bears play, with those in the southern half of the state “downright apathetic.”
  • Meanwhile, it turns out the clause in Illinois’ proposed tax break bill that would add “property tax relief” to any subsidy for a Bears stadium or other “megaprojects” wouldn’t be much relief at all: An average Illinois homeowner would only get $1.29 off their property tax bill as a result. (And that’s even if their overall property tax bill didn’t go up by more than that to cover lost revenues from the megaproject tax break.) The total cost of the megaprojects bill in future tax expenditures has yet to be calculated — and may be uncalculatable, since we don’t know how many future developments would apply or how much of a tax break they’d negotiate with local governments, but that doesn’t mean nobody should give it a try before the Illinois legislature goes ahead and votes on this thing.
  • And also meanwhile, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson is trying to block a potential Bears move to the suburb of Arlington Heights by pressing Chicago-area state legislators to oppose the megaprojects tax break bill. State senate Legislative Black Caucus chair Willie Preston then said he’s on board to oppose it, then said he was misinterpreted, then said he would just like a megaprojeets tax subsidy that would let the Bears stay in Chicago somehow. Illinois Kremlinologists please report to the situation room, stat.
  • New Jersey has cut train fares to World Cup matches from $150 to $105, thanks to what Gov. Mikie Sherrill says are private companies that have “stepped up to lower the costs for ticket holders,” whatever that means exactly. (Sherrill has promised that New Jersey Transit’s $48 million in expected World Cup costs won’t come out of transit riders’ pockets, but the details of who’s donating what in exchange for what here are still very murky.) The price cut will be good for soccer fans, unless it ends up increasing the ticket prices that fans will accept now that they’ll be saving $45 on getting to the game, in which case it will only be good for FIFA.
  • A report by Oxford Economics says that World Cup cities should expect to see only a “modest bump” from fan spending this summer, says report author Barbara Denham, and no measurable impact at all on overall economic activity, noting “there’s a lot of displacement of tourism” as other visitors steer clear of cities that will be mobbed by World Cup fans. And that’s even if, of course, the World Cup mobs don’t steer clear as well: Add Seattle to the list of cities where fans are getting set to show up disguised as empty hotel rooms.
  • Houston Texans owner Cal McNair isn’t saying what kind of stadium renovations he’ll seek in advance of his team’s lease expiring at the end of 2032, but he did say he’s hoping they’ll be “transformative,” which is usually code for “a lot of zeroes after the dollar sign.”
  • A Minnesota legislator wants to apply the same ticket tax paid by Vikings ticket buyers to currently exempt buyers of luxury suites and earmark the proceeds to provide services to youth victims of sex trafficking. Bill opponents, clearly not eager to look like they’re siding with either luxury suite buyers or sex traffickers, have instead objected that she submitted her bill to the wrong committee.
  • Residents of Denver’s historic La Alma-Lincoln Park neighborhood are trying to work out a community benefits agreement with the Broncos owners to keep from being overwhelmed by traffic and displacement if the team builds a new stadium nearby. Community leaders say this will be the first legally binding CBA negotiated by an NFL team with a community group rather than a local government — something they might want to think carefully about, as history shows that it can be a problem if it comes time to enforce a CBA and none of the community group signatories are still around to do it.
  • New Orleans has just seized the lead in the race to be the first major sports city to be abandoned due to climate change.
  • And finally, RIP Gap cofounder Doris Fisher, who will now not be around to see if her middle son spends the family fortune on building a spherical armadillo.
Share this post:

10 comments on “Friday roundup: Rays blink on June 1 stadium deadline, Illinois residents don’t want to break the bank to keep Bears

    1. Hey there, fellow Illinoisan (far north here).
      I’m not apathetic about it – I don’t want it at all. Don’t want to waste valuable funds on it and don’t want it anywhere near my house to clog up roads.

  1. Sphermadillo update:

    https://ballparkexperience.athletics.com/construction

    And just a block or two from the Stephen Paddock mass shooting site!

    Anyone (else) wondering how much of a premium MGM resorts is charging to stay in that very room???

    1. I don’t know if your comment was serious or not, but they re-numbered the floors and converted that specific room into storage.
      https://www.reviewjournal.com/crime/shootings/mandalay-bay-renumbering-floor-associated-with-las-vegas-shooting-1304543/
      https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-vegas-mass-shootings-sites-20171020-htmlstory.html

      1. Thanks. It was serious, and I am surprised to find MGM resorts has taken that room off the market. Did they do this before or after they sued the victims of the shooting for ‘failing to take appropriate actions to protect themselves’ at the concert they were attending when shot by a guest of the resort?

  2. The Rays’ so-called concession might be presented as a “win” for fiscal and legislative discipline, but it’s really more akin to an old-school bookie giving one of his clients some extra time to make good on their gambling debts — with the both the bookie and the client knowing full well what could happen if time eventually runs out.

    I’ll say this for Zalupski: he and his managing partners have done the type of skid-greasing with local and state legislators that the guy they bought the Rays from never bothered to do in all his years of owning the franchise. That alone will put him in good stead as far as this situation goes.

  3. Don’t knock my $1.29 tax break. I can get almost a quarter gallon of gas with that savings.

  4. Nobody should be surprised at the lower than anticipated demand when you see the sky high prices.

    I personally have met multiple people from other countries living in the US who would love to go to the World Cup but can’t afford it due to the insane ticket prices. Adding in travel and hotel prices, it’s pricing out a lot of fans for sure.

    It’s just like the blue dot phenomenon with concerts. They pushed the prices way too high and completely underestimated how many people would pay it.

    1. Agreed. It’s a standard tactic to keep raising prices to see if there is someone dumb or desperate enough to pay it. Sooner or later, you hit that limit.

      The question is, what underlying damage have you done to the business by “being that way”? Once you hit the magic number that people will not pay, will there be a softening of demand or will demand collapse as people who were previously customers decide they want no part of you.

      When you have really abused your customers over the years, sometimes a discount just won’t bring them back (certainly not all of them).

      I’d say I hope ‘they’ learn their lesson, but let’s face it, they never have and never will.

  5. “In a statement, Broncos President Damani Leech said the organization is looking forward to beginning the negotiations “with a shared sense of urgency and cooperation.””

    ————–

    Such an appropriate name for someone negotiating a massive public subsidy for a new stadium.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Personal attacks on other commenters are not allowed and will be removed.