If Arte Moreno sells the Angels, what will it mean for the team’s stadium future (and stupid name)?

Limping my way back to full efficacy here, but I don’t want too much news to pile up, so let’s give this a shot. One of the bigger items to drop in the last week was that Los Angeles Angels owner Arte Moreno, would-be stadium land grifter and serial Mike Trout squanderer, is looking into selling the team that he bought for $180 million in 2003:

“It has been a great honor and privilege to own the Angels for 20 seasons,” Moreno said in a release. “Although this difficult decision was entirely our choice and deserved a great deal of thoughtful consideration, my family and I have ultimately come to the conclusion that now is the time.”

For Angels fans, this may come not a moment too soon; for everyone else, it’s more of a puzzle that a rich guy who tethered his ego to his ownership of an MLB franchise would abruptly throw in the towel. Several questions suggest themselves:

  • Is this because the stadium deal fell apart? Sports team owners typically know that that the collapse of one stadium deal isn’t anything to lose sleep over, because there’s always the potential for another one around the corner. But the collapse of Moreno’s campaign to get Angel Stadium land at a cut-rate price imploded especially dramatically: FBI investigations, the resignation of the mayor, charges of illegal helicopter registration. Add in that this was already Moreno’s second go-round — he had another land deal in hand with the city of Anaheim a decade earlier before then-mayor Tom Tait scuttled it — and maybe he figured he’d let somebody else beat their head against this particular white whale.
  • Is Moreno just old? Arte Moreno just turned 76, and if none of his kids are interested in inheriting the Angels, he may have just figured it’s a good time to get out. The latest Forbes-estimated value for the Angels is $2.2 billion, which would provide a nice return on investment for 20 years of mismanagement, which Moreno could use to go buy himself an election or something.
  • Did he realize he’s not very good at this? It can’t have escaped Moreno’s notice that the last time the Angels won a World Series was the year before he bought the team, and they’ve only made the playoffs once in the last 12 years despite the presence of one of the best players in the history of baseball (two, if you count Shohei Ohtani in recent seasons). This seems unlikely since Moreno has never seemed to learn any lessons from terrible moves like signing Albert Pujols and Josh Hamilton to long-term deals just as they started to suck, but there’s a first time for everything.
  • Will the team name change again? Moreno famously changed the Anaheim Angels name to “Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim,” in hopes of grabbing a bigger share of the Los Angeles market from fans who didn’t own maps. This has been roundly unpopular in Anaheim — countless hours of hearings on the stadium deal were wasted on complaining about the team name — so it’s possible a new owner could switch back, but it all depends on who that is.

Then there’s the future of the stadium, which Moreno holds a lease on through 2029, meaning there’s plenty of time for him to pass off any decisions to the next owner. This suggests one last possibility, actually: Moreno may have decided that his association with Mayor Harry Sidhu’s bribery scandal was too much to overcome, and he’d be better off leaving the pursuit of a sweetheart stadium land development deal to some other rich dude without so much baggage. Or, sure, in a perfect world maybe a new buyer will give up on increasing the value of his new asset by extracting some public subsidies, but you don’t get to be rich enough to own a pro sports team by leaving money like that on the table.

Or maybe, as Marc Normandin summed it up, it really is just that Moreno is a real weirdo. Sports team owners sometimes do things for dumb reasons just like the rest of us.

Share this post:

Friday roundup: Bills still have other people making their threats for them, plus this week’s cavalcade of terrible journalism

That Arizona Coyotes news really laid waste to my planned writing schedule this morning, so I’m afraid the Friday roundup is going to be extra-brief and extra-late today:

  • NBC Sports’ Mike Florio, clearly not satisfied with having twisted Buffalo Bills move-threat leverage into being a real threat, doubled down yesterday with a column saying the “clock is ticking” because the Bills’ lease is up in 2023 and if they start talking to other cities they won’t “want other cities to sense that they’re being used in an effort to get a better deal in Buffalo” but instead will only be seriously looking to move. Florio has been doing this for a long time and presumably is familiar with the history of team move threats, which have nothing to do with when leases expire or not wanting to toy with other cities’ emotions and everything to do with ego and the search for greater profits, but also Florio has been doing this for a long time and pretty much sees everything through NFL-ownership-colored glasses, so none of this is surprising, except maybe that NBC Sports continues to employ him.
  • Speaking of the Bills, New York Sen. Chuck Schumer declared this week that he’s “confident the Bills will stay in Buffalo” now that the state has “a new governor from Western New York who’s a Bills fan” who can “work with the team” and the NFL on shoveling public money at a new stadium. He didn’t actually say that last part out loud, but what else could he mean, right? That Kathy Hochul will show up at negotiations in a Bills jersey and the NFL will say, “You’re our kind of people, forget that whole $1.4 billion thing”?
  • The Regina Red Sox owners still want a new $20-25 million stadium, and still are willing to put up $5 million while “the rest would have to come from the city or other funds the city could access.” I, too, am willing to put up 20% of the cost of a new home; anyone who would like to cover the other 80%, I take Paypal.
  • The Los Angeles Clippers‘ new arena in Inglewood could break ground this month, according to a Sports Illustrated article based on a Substack post by disgraced-for-plagiarism-and-cronyism former L.A. Times writer Arash Markazi, in turn based entirely on a statement by Inglewood Mayor James Butts that he “hopes” the team will break ground this month, never mind, nothing to see here, just another game of journalistic telephone.
  • Speaking of lazy stenography journalism, here’s an entire Tampa Bay Times article on how Tampa city officials are convinced the Rays are going to build a stadium in their city, because, um, they just are, okay? The TB Times ran a great op-ed this week by a Covid expert laying out clearly and with simple math the risks of the Delta variant and the efficacy of vaccines, maybe go read that instead and skip their sports coverage.
  • The Cleveland Plain Dealer wants you to subscribe to their newspaper in order to read their terrible article on how the NFL Draft supposedly brought in $42 million in economic activity to the city, based entirely on a press release by the local sports authority, don’t click on the PD at all, you’ll only encourage them.
Share this post:

Seriously, how did Kevin Johnson end up running Sacramento like his own personal fiefdom?

The Baffler, the magazine that published what remains the best article I’ve ever seen on the scam that is the internship economy (and which remains even more of a scam today, if anything), has just published a long article by the Sacramento News & Review’s Cosmo Garvin on the disaster that has been Kevin Johnson’s political career, highlighted by spending $300 million on a new Kings arena that will open this fall. (Okay, also highlighted by charges that he’s a serial sexual abuser/harasser. Or maybe that’s a lowlight. Or maybe they both are.) It also talks about the lawsuit that Mayor KJ filed against Garvin and the N&R over his public records requests for city emails, and includes one of the best nut grafs you’ll ever see:

The lawsuit, the arena, KJ’s talent for diverting public resources for private gain, even the sex-creep stuff: to me, these facts seem to hang together under a common theme. The guy has boundary issues.

This gets into an area that I’ve always been curious about, which is: Why is it that so many local politicians, once they get into office, behave so much like, you know, politicians? Individuals who might have seemed perfectly sane in private life suddenly start mouthing platitudes and kowtowing to the usual moneyed interests and carrying out policies that are the exact opposite of what they’d promised. It’s incredibly common and fairly creepy, and a big reason why so many Americans don’t trust politicians as a group, even as they keep voting for them based on their promises.

Some of this, no doubt, is due to the political system itself: If you want to get re-elected, you need to say certain things and suck up to certain donors and make sure your daughter goes to a politically acceptable school, and so on. But I suspect that there’s a self-weeding aspect here as well. Think about it: There are thousands of former NBA players, many of which could use their celebrity to run for mayor of some city; why KJ? He certainly doesn’t need the money, or the fame. It takes a very special combination of ego, need for attention, and yes, lack of boundaries to decide that you’re going to merge your city with your personal brand, and declare that anyone opposed to one is opposed to both. And then sue them.

Obviously, not every mayor in the U.S. has set up their own secret government or molested teenagers — KJ is clearly special at this. But I think there’s a particular draw for people like that to run for public office: Anyone who can put up with the pressures of the political spotlight is going to require some, er, special characteristics, and they’re not necessarily ones that make for good management of the public interest. KJ is, by all accounts, a dangerous loon, but the system that put him in charge of a major American city is the bigger concern.

Not that I have any solutions to propose. Other than to ban unpaid internships, because that shit is seriously unethical and illegal.

Share this post: