Grand Rapids tax hike to fund soccer stadium/amphitheater would create economic windfall, says … oh look who it is!

Kent County, Michigan is set to hold a public vote on August 6 on whether to hike its hotel tax rate from 5% to 8% to fund a minor-league soccer stadium and music amphitheater, and if you’re wondering things like “Why should I care?” and “Where the hell is Kent County?” wait till you hear who did the economic impact study:

Over a 32-year period, the estimated economic impact of the proposed soccer stadium and the 12,000-capacity Acrisure Amphitheater totals $1.2 billion in Kent County, according to an economic impact study commissioned by Grand Action 2.0, the private economic development group leading the charge to build the venues…

How did the author of the study, CSL International, come up with those figures? Are they accurate? How likely is the economic impact to materialize?

Yes, it’s the Wile E. Coyote of economic impact studies again! If past history is any guide, CSL came up with those figures through math errors, but let’s go check out their report and see … oh, it’s not online? Not even on Grand Action 2.0, the site set up by the private business owners seeking to get public money for their project, one of whom is Dick DeVos, the Amway failson and husband of Trump education secretary Betsy DeVos? Well, let’s see what CSL officials had to say, I guess:

For example, consider a family that buys a pizza, hot dog, beer and soda, he said. Demand for those products ripple through the economy, and can be felt by the companies that supply food and beverages to the amphitheater, [CSL principal John] Kaatz said.

“Somebody’s got to deliver the product to the stadium,” he said. “So, you’ve got delivery guys from off-site bringing in all the product. Then the product has to be warehoused at then venue. It has to be prepared at the venue. The product has to come from somewhere, so it’s shipped maybe from a wholesaler to another vendor who ends up shipping it to the stadium.”

Sure. Now consider a family that doesn’t go to a minor-league soccer game, and instead eats dinner somewhere else. Somebody’s got to deliver that food to the restaurant, or to the supermarket. Think of all the jobs that are created by people doing whatever they do with their lives now that have nothing to do with soccer! The economy is a wonderful web of spending, and a lot of it has to do with people just being hungry and needing places to live, and those things don’t change when there’s a new soccer stadium in town.

But then, I’m not an economist, unlike John Kaatz, who, well, has a bachelor’s in economics, I’ll give him that. What do actual professional economists say about his expertise?

(No actual economists were cited in MLive’s article, presumably because it took too long to transcribe all of Kaatz’s quotes and there was a deadline approaching, what do you want from your journalists, blood?)

The hotel tax rate hike is expected to generate an additional $9 million a year for the projects, which would cover about $140 million in construction costs — though that’s presumably assuming that people don’t start staying in the next county over, or avoiding the tourist mecca of Grand Rapids altogether, to avoid the high hotel taxes. The soccer stadium — to be the home of “professional soccer,” according to Grand Action 2.0’s website, no further details provided, though there’s previously been talk of a USL franchise — would require $115 million in public funds, and an accompanying 10,000-seat amphitheater would cost $114 million,  so this will require additional state and city money as well, some of which has already been approved. Assuming that the hotel tax hike passes on August 6, that is, which this woman is committed to stopping with her stern glare.

UPDATE: Wait wait wait, this is better:

Share this post:

Plague of minor-league soccer stadium subsidy demands reaches pandemic proportions

Oh hey, USL press release about the ill-fated Pawtucket soccer stadium project, which utterly fails to mention either the metastasizing public costs or the fact that Rhode Island voters now oppose funding it by a 44-35% margin. Anything else in there of actual interest?

Tidewater Landing becomes one of five current stadium projects that are under construction in the USL Championship and USL League One, including one for a future USL Championship club in Des Moines, Iowa. There are another 11 stadium projects approved or in development across USL Championship and League One, following clubs such as Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC, Louisville City FC, Monterey Bay F.C., and Chattanooga Red Wolves SC, whose new homes have opened in recent years.

So, five stadiums under construction (or at least having had a groundbreaking, which lets Pawtucket qualify even though funding hasn’t gotten final approval) and 11 others “in development” — that’s rather a lot, even for a league that currently sports 38 teams across two levels in an attempt to take over the U.S. soccer world by sheer volume. The press release doesn’t specify which cities the USL is currently getting or seeking stadiums in, so with the help of the Field of Schemes archives and Reddit, let’s attempt a rundown in rough order of approvalness:

That’s 19 potential projects, though only maybe ten of them could be considered in progress, and for some of those you’d have to squint really hard. John Mozena of the Center for Economic Accountability, the people behind those excellent stickers, has a Twitter thread about this whole kerfuffle, in which he points out that sports stadiums, thanks to being closed and empty most of the time, have less economic impact than your typical supermarket or chain food store:

If there’s a silver lining to all this, it’s that most of the USL stadium campaigns appear to be spinning their wheels to various degrees. If there’s whatever is the opposite of a silver lining, it’s that none of the potential team owners are giving up, because why stop grabbing for that brass subsidy ring if you can maybe get tens of millions of dollars if you get lucky? Not sure if the USL qualifies as a Ponzi scheme yet, but it’s certainly striving to head in that direction.

Share this post:

Friday roundup: Baseball ticket chaos, and the continuing endless rain of minor-league soccer stadium demands

New York state announced yesterday that baseball stadiums will be open at 20% capacity to start the season, which, as things go, is not one of the stupidest reopenings announced by Gov. Gropey this week. As a Mets fan who will be fully vaccinated-plus-two-weeks by shortly after Opening Day, it has me weighing whether sitting three hours masked and distanced outdoors at a ballgame is low-risk enough to be worth considering or still terrible for society as a whole, which in turn had me checking out the Mets’ ticket sale policies:

All ticket management actions for tickets for impacted games [in April], including Ticket Forwarding, will be canceled. These tickets will be removed from your account and are no longer valid for admission.

Glad I didn’t buy tickets when I first noticed they were on sale a couple of weeks ago, because those are apparently now worthless. (Worthless for entry, anyway; you can still get a credit on your account for the purchase price.) Season ticket holders will get first dibs at buying the new blocks of tickets, at least for April; it’s unclear when the mad scramble for seats begins.

Then I checked the Yankees‘ site, and found this:

To be eligible, fans must have purchased their tickets through Ticketmaster and not have transferred, posted or resold them. If the tickets were transferred, the transferee or recipient of the ticket will need to transfer the tickets back to the original purchaser in order for the original purchaser to request a credit or refund. The credit request option is not available for tickets purchased via resale or the secondary market.

If you bought through Stubhub or the like, in other words, you are SOL, unless you can find the person you bought from and have them ask for a refund, then refund you.

I get why the teams are doing this — rather than figure out how to reassign already-purchased seats in distanced pods, it’s way simpler to just refund everybody and start fresh with new ticket sales. But it’s hard not to foresee a whole lot of lawsuits, or at least angry tweets, from people who bought or sold what are now worthless barcodes, and questions about whether pro sports are becoming the latest realm where buying a thing doesn’t mean you’re actually buying it.

Anyway, enough about that. On to the stadium and arena news, which I know you’ve been waiting for and which includes lots of good juicy schadenfreude, plus more minor-league soccer than you can shake a stick at:

  • I’ve been mostly steering clear of the debate over where to build a new high-school sports stadium in Spokane, because, frankly, high-school sports stadium in Spokane, and also the money ($31 million) has already been allocated, so it’s now just a question of where to build it. But if you want an explainer, here’s a good one, which I will now summarize even more briefly: Spokane residents want the stadium to be built where the current stadium is, but the USL says it’ll put a soccer team in Spokane if they move it to a site downtown, so now city officials are trying to decide who it’s more important to listen to, their constituents or the guys dangling a minor-league soccer franchise. Also local business advocates say that if the city doesn’t build a stadium downtown, the USL may look to build there anyway, and they already have $2 million in cash plus a promise of $1 million from an unidentified investor, and that’s only $28 million short! More news as events warrant, which I seriously hope is never.
  • Elsewhere in everybody-gets-a-pro-soccer-team, Grand Rapids may get a USL team if it can be determined how to fund a $40 million stadium. Nobody’s talking public money just yet, but a guy from Convention, Sports & Leisure — yes, those guys — has been hired to talk up how a stadium “has the ability to anchor development, serve as a destination but also kind of speed up and accelerate reinvestment into areas of the city, whether that’s in downtown or on the purview of downtown,” so it’s gotta be only a matter of time.
  • And the Indy Eleven, currently of the USL but maybe one day to be in MLS if you dream real hard, are still seeking their own $150 million stadium, saying it would be “more than a stadium, it is the opportunity to create a vibrant community that will attract individuals and families from near and far to live, work and play — creating jobs and improving quality of place far beyond game day.” Team owner Ersal Ozdemir already got $112 million in state money approved for the stadium last year, but then decided maybe he’d build a smaller stadium and give up on the plans to join MLS that were the whole reason for him getting the $112 million. The state legislature is currently deciding whether to give Ozdemir more time to figure out exactly which scam he wants to pull or to take back the money; “give him more rope” just unanimously passed the state house ways and means committee, so that’s not a great sign.
  • A Nevada state senator is proposing to create a state esports commission to lure major video-game tournaments to Nevada, because “economic development.” I’m still not entirely clear how many people actually travel to attend esports rather than just watching online — attendance figures are brutally hard to come by online, though apparently 45,000 turned out for one event in Beijing in 2017 — but this is one to keep an eye on, especially if esports organizers start choosing site based less on who has the most regulatory oversight (?) and more on who offers cold, hard cash.
  • And finally, circling back to questionable sports reopenings, the Texas Rangers decided to advertise their 100% capacity opening day by showing a fan flagrantly violating their own mask rules. This is all going to go just great!

 

 

Share this post: