NYC to put up $??? in tax breaks, infrastructure money for NYCFC stadium in Queens

As has been rumored for weeks now, New York City Mayor Eric Adams and the insanely wealthy Abu Dhabians who own NYC F.C. have announced that they’ve reached agreement on a new soccer stadium in the Willets Points section of Queens, near the Mets’ stadium that no one wants to use the corporate name for. (The official announcement comes today — UPDATE: at 11:30 am, streaming here — but apparently the city and team gave the New York Times an exclusive.) The cost: $780 million, which doesn’t include the price of a 250-room hotel and 2,500 units of affordable housing that would come along with it.

As for who’ll pay for it, city and team officials said the construction cost will be covered by the team owners. City officials, according to the New York Times, “said subsidies for this project are largely limited to infrastructure improvements at the site and property tax breaks for the stadium.”

So, that could mean a lot of things. “Infrastructure” has been interpreted in other cities to mean anything from running water and sewer lines to a stadium (things that Willets Point famously doesn’t have) to building transportation and sea-level-rise protection for an entire new neighborhood. As for property tax breaks, exempting a $780 million stadium from property taxes should be worth at least a hundred million right there; if it’s extended to the hotel and housing as well, it could come to quite a tidy sum for the soccer owners.

For now, at least, the project announcement seems to put an end to two things: NYC F.C.’s crazy-ass plan to build a stadium atop a highway ramp in the Bronx, and the wannabe USL team Queensboro F.C.‘s plans to build their own soccer stadium in Willets Point. In fact, it looks like Queensboro F.C. has been put an end to itself: In a stadium announcement preview post on Monday, Front Row Soccer declared that “according to sources, the club is defunct and won’t be competing in the USL Championship.” That would explain why several people have reported to me that the Queensboro F.C. stadium that was supposed to be built at York College by now in fact hasn’t even started construction.

More details today after the official announcement, maybe, if Mayor Adams divulges anything more or reporters ask any probing questions, neither of which is a great bet, but hope springs eternal…

 

Share this post:

Plague of minor-league soccer stadium subsidy demands reaches pandemic proportions

Oh hey, USL press release about the ill-fated Pawtucket soccer stadium project, which utterly fails to mention either the metastasizing public costs or the fact that Rhode Island voters now oppose funding it by a 44-35% margin. Anything else in there of actual interest?

Tidewater Landing becomes one of five current stadium projects that are under construction in the USL Championship and USL League One, including one for a future USL Championship club in Des Moines, Iowa. There are another 11 stadium projects approved or in development across USL Championship and League One, following clubs such as Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC, Louisville City FC, Monterey Bay F.C., and Chattanooga Red Wolves SC, whose new homes have opened in recent years.

So, five stadiums under construction (or at least having had a groundbreaking, which lets Pawtucket qualify even though funding hasn’t gotten final approval) and 11 others “in development” — that’s rather a lot, even for a league that currently sports 38 teams across two levels in an attempt to take over the U.S. soccer world by sheer volume. The press release doesn’t specify which cities the USL is currently getting or seeking stadiums in, so with the help of the Field of Schemes archives and Reddit, let’s attempt a rundown in rough order of approvalness:

That’s 19 potential projects, though only maybe ten of them could be considered in progress, and for some of those you’d have to squint really hard. John Mozena of the Center for Economic Accountability, the people behind those excellent stickers, has a Twitter thread about this whole kerfuffle, in which he points out that sports stadiums, thanks to being closed and empty most of the time, have less economic impact than your typical supermarket or chain food store:

If there’s a silver lining to all this, it’s that most of the USL stadium campaigns appear to be spinning their wheels to various degrees. If there’s whatever is the opposite of a silver lining, it’s that none of the potential team owners are giving up, because why stop grabbing for that brass subsidy ring if you can maybe get tens of millions of dollars if you get lucky? Not sure if the USL qualifies as a Ponzi scheme yet, but it’s certainly striving to head in that direction.

Share this post:

Queensboro FC is getting cut rate on college land, the trick is figuring out how many millions’ worth

On Tuesday when I threw up my hands at figuring out whether $2 million was a fair price for Queensboro F.C. to pay for a five-year licensing agreement to stick a 7,500-seat soccer stadium on York College land, I had hopes that my hands wouldn’t stay that way forever. And now, thanks to a consult from a property valuation expert, I think we have a way to at least make a start at a guesstimate:

If a sports team were looking to lease a regular plot of land at market value, one would expect that at the very least, the property owner would want them to cover the parcel’s annual property tax bill. Since York College is part of the City University of New York, its land is tax-exempt — as is all public and nonprofit college-owned land in New York, including the frigging Chrysler Building. But it still gets assessed by the city to see what taxes it would pay if it had to, which for the soccer stadium land can be found here and here.

The total assessed value of the land is $14,257,620. If taxed at the regular rate, it would owe $1,524,709 a year in property taxes. Over five years, that comes to $7,623,549.

Queensboro F.C., though, isn’t going to be using the stadium all of the time. If we knock off 51% of the price on the logic that York College will have use of the space 51% of the time — not that it will likely use all of that, but let’s just go with it — then we have an expected market value of at least $3.8 million. That’s nearly double what CUNY is actually getting.

And that “at least” is very much a lowball figure, for two important reasons. First off, it’s likely that a private landlord would want to do more than just cover their property taxes if renting out land. And second, city property assessments are notoriously low, especially in cases where the land isn’t generating any tax money anyway, so it doesn’t much matter what value the city puts on it. (Cf. the whole New York Yankees stadium mishegoss.) So really the best we can say is the soccer team owner’s land discount is somewhere between $1.8 million and … a lot more than that.

The best way to determine market value, obviously, is to put land on the market — but CUNY hasn’t done that, issuing a request for proposals only for “development, design, construction and licensed operation and management of an athletic facility and soccer stadium.” So until then, we have to go with our best guess, which right now is that Queensboro F.C. owner and Chinese investment impersario Jonathan Krane is getting a sweetheart deal worth at least several million dollars compared to what he would have to pay for stadium land elsewhere, if he could even find it at all. As always, public officials really should be hiring experts to do their stadium negotiations for them, because when left to their own devices in this area, they kinda suck.

 

 

Share this post:

Inside the Queensboro FC lease: How USL team is getting to build a soccer stadium on a public college campus

Back in April, I reported on the announcement by the Queensboro F.C. USL team of an agreement with the City University of New York to begin work this summer on a 7,500-stadium on York College’s campus in Jamaica, Queens. I immediately asked York College for a copy of the lease, and was told I would need to file a Freedom of Information Law request; as I noted at the time, “this could be a while.”

It sure was! On April 29, I sent a request to CUNY’s FOIL officer requesting “any leases, contracts, or operating agreements between CUNY or York College and Queensboro FC or its representatives regarding construction of a stadium at York College, issued or signed between November 1, 2020 and April 29, 2021.” On June 2, I got an email notifying me that CUNY needed more time to decide whether to fulfill my request. On July 6, I was notified that “more time is needed to complete their review,” and that I’d hear back by July 16. On July 28, I got yet another email, this one saying that they needed until August 7, “because of the length of the contract requested and the review required of said document before disclosure pursuant to FOIL.”

On Monday, August 9, CUNY’s lawyers presumably having finally read through the contract to ensure there was no confidential information being disclosed, I finally got a copy of the Queensboro F.C. stadium license agreement. Here’s the full document, and here are some of the highlights:

  • The agreement is a five-year lease, with the option for four one-year extensions. The team’s owners will pay for construction of the stadium — no price tag provided — and CUNY will own it and the land under it, which means Queensboro F.C. won’t have to pay property tax.
  • CUNY will lease the stadium to Queensboro F.C. for a one-time fee of $2 million, plus 15% of any naming rights payments (with a minimum of $50,000 per year).
  • The team gets all revenue from sale of ad signage and the like, plus the bulk of any naming rights money.
  • The stadium is only temporary: Queensboro F.C. plans to build a permanent stadium “in another location in Queens, New York” — there’s been talk of something in Willets Point near the Mets‘ stadium, but not for over two years now — and in fact can cancel the entire deal if no permanent stadium is approved by March 1, 2022.

That’s a lot, and it gets even a lotter. The stadium is being built “as-of-right,” meaning in accordance with existing zoning. Since the site’s current zoning is R6 — up-to-mid-sized apartment buildings with stores at ground level, basically — and that doesn’t allow for “commercial or professional recreation,” the city Department of Buildings signed off, but with a caveat: The stadium would have to be primarily operated by CUNY, with the USL team only “accessory to the primary education function & mandate.” The lease, in fact, specifies that CUNY would get use of the stadium 51% of the year — slightly weird, since a USL team wouldn’t need more than 182 days a year of stadium use anyway, but significantly less weird if that clause is what enables everyone to maintain the pretense that this is really a stadium for students, and York College just happens to be leasing it out to Queensboro part of the time.

(This likely helps with CUNY not having to get anyone’s permission to lease out its property, too: It’s not really turning over a large swath of public land to a private sports team, it’s just getting a private sports team to build a soccer stadium on its campus, and then generously allowing the sports team to use it half the time.)

So, we have CUNY and the city agreeing to look the other way on zoning to grease the skids for a private soccer stadium on public land — cutting through red tape, it’s the American way! As for how much of a subsidy this deal represents, that’s as yet undetermined: Getting a stadium that you don’t have to pay property tax on is worth something, but it will take some number-crunching to determine exactly what; and whether $2 million is a lot or a little for use of about 3.5 acres of Queens land is going to be even trickier to calculate than the whole New York Islanders mess was.

And speaking of the size of the land, remember this image comparing a typical USL stadium, this one for San Antonio F.C., with the plot that Queensboro was hoping to build on?

The actual comparable stadium Queensboro is looking at turns out to be Loudoun United‘s in Virginia, so let’s drop that onto a map of York College and see what we get:

Better! But still very tight, especially if people are going to be able to get to their seats. The bleachers, according to schematics attached to the lease, will be supported by a metal lattice, so there won’t be a lot of circulation room under them:

Anyway, figuring out how to squeeze stadiums into available space isn’t the job of this website, it’s that of Populous engineers. (Yes, Populous is designing this thing, their name is even on the zoning application.) The upshot here is: A privately owned soccer team has gotten a public college to let it drop a 7,500-seat stadium on its campus, in exchange for $2 million and letting the school use it part of the time, without having to either pay property taxes or go through the usual public rezoning process. And this is apparently only step one en route to another stadium elsewhere in the borough, which is somehow expected to be approved by next March, despite a new mayor and city council taking office in January. (Queens Borough President Donovan Richards will be staying put, after winning a special election last year to finish out his predecessor’s term.)

Like I said, it’s a lot. I’ll be following up on some of the remaining loose ends, and maybe taking a drive out to York College to see what the progress of construction is. The Queensboro F.C. stadium campaign has really been flying under media radar, but especially with the USL’s apparent plans to go toe-to-toe with MLS for soccer domination, it definitely bears watching.

Share this post:

Queensboro FC announces stadium to be built with mystery money on too-small public college land, this is fine

When last we checked in on USL expansion team Queensboro F.C.‘s plans to build a 7,500-seat stadium on the campus of York College about a year and a half ago, that was pretty much all there was for details: Nothing about how much it would cost, who would pay for it (other than the local city councilmember’s claim that it would be “100 percent privately funded” by the club, which as we’ve previously seen in New York can mean lots of things), or how it would fit on a City University of New York campus that is wedged into populous Jamaica, Queens.

Yesterday, Queensboro F.C. and York College announced that construction on the stadium will begin this summer, after CUNY approved the team’s contract. The project will reportedly be a “partnership” between the club and the college, and will cost … no, nothing about that, but the contract will involve … nope, no details there either, though we do learn that York students will get to hear from the soccer team’s staff and players as guest speakers. Maybe this WABC-TV video that for some reason appears on Yahoo! News will provide more details? Why did I even type that sentence?

What we do learn is a location for the proposed stadium — “near the corner of 160th Street and Tuskegee Airmen Way” — and a rendering, which is sadly lacking in gratuitous fireworks but does enable us to figure out exactly which plot of land the team plans to use:

That round building in the background is clearly the school’s gym, currently in use as a vaccination site. This means that the stadium will be built on the currently vacant land to the south (and also that in the image above, the sun is setting in the north, because that’s just how vaportecture rolls):

How well will a 7,500-seat stadium fit into that space? Let’s take 8,000-seat Toyota Field, home of San Antonio F.C. of the USL, size it to the same scale in Google Maps, and plop it down on that plot of land:

Eek. That’s … not so good? Maybe even more not so good than when David Beckham’s Inter Miami released renderings of a stadium that would be built on top of parked cars and then backed away from it because the site shockingly turned out to be too small.

There are a few ways Queensboro can try to squeeze a stadium into that space: They can reduce the size of the sideline seating and put more seats into the ends, which the rendering actually appears to have done, though this makes for less desirable fan views. And soccer pitches can actually vary in width: San Antonio’s is 70 yards wide, and the minimum according to FIFA rules is … okay, 70 yards, so that’s not going to help much.

At best, then, it’s going to be a tight squeeze; at worst, you might see the stadium need to encroach a bit onto Tuskegee Airmen Way, which has buildings right across the street and so can’t easily be moved. Though it’s worth noting that the last time I said a New York sports venue was impossible because existing buildings were in the way, the team involved solved the problem by just knocking down the buildings.

And we haven’t even gotten to the cost or how it will be paid, or whether Queensboro F.C. will pay New York City (which owns the campus) for the land. The Queens Eagle reports that “York College will allow QBFC to use its land for the stadium and the club will bankroll construction and operation, a CUNY spokesperson said,” but that’s not really the level of detail we need to determine the level of subsidies for this project. (Will the stadium be exempt from property taxes by virtue of sitting on public land? Will it require additional public approvals? And so on.)

I’m going to close with the same thing I wrote the first time this project was proposed: “Friends don’t let friends reprint sports team owner press releases without at least trying to check their facts, okay?” Like, really. Did you journalists out there think I was joking? Did you take me seriously, but are trapped in a hellish existence where you’re forced to churn out rehashed press releases all day long, without time to think or breathe or go to the bathroom? Blink twice if you need me to call the labor department.

Share this post:

Queensboro FC still vague on how its stadium on a public university campus will work

Ever since last Tuesday’s announcement that New York City would be getting a new USL team called Queensboro F.C. in 2021, I’ve been trying to figure out where exactly this second-tier (soccer’s term for the top minor league) team would play. That was the holdup when the franchise was first rumored last winter, and while last week’s announcement mentioned a “new, modular stadium at York College in Queens that will have a capacity of around 7,500,” none of the news outlets appeared to have actually called York College to see who would build it or where it would go, important questions given that the campus, though conveniently located right by a major subway terminal, isn’t exactly bursting with huge swathes of vacant land.

So, I called. And was directed to a press spokesperson for the City University of New York school, who said she’d get back to me with a statement from the school’s president, but couldn’t “promise it will be today.” That was Thursday; it’s now Tuesday, and still no statement has been forthcoming.

I next tried the team itself, whose press representative told me yesterday they’d be back to me “shortly”; I’m still waiting. After that, it was on to city councilmember Francisco Moya, who has helped shepherd the team into existence and declared himself one of its first fans, whose communications director actually replied:

Queensboro FC will be playing in a modular stadium, which will be 100 percent privately funded through the club. The City is not involved in the arrangement between QBFC and York College.

That is slightly more of an answer, but not much of one. Where will this stadium be built? Does a “modular stadium” just mean a bunch of temporary bleachers that can be taken down and stored away when York College needs to use its track? Is York College being paid anything for use of its land? And does the public university have to get any city or state permissions before repurposing public land?

These are all kind of important questions, and it’s reflective of the sad state of journalism in this city (and in this country, and on this planet) that no one seems to have asked them — or, worse, has asked them and when they didn’t get answers, didn’t bother to mention that in their articles. (It’s also sad that an entire minor-league baseball team in Staten Island has been marked for elimination, and none of the city press has deigned to report on borough residents’ thoughts on that — or has just forgotten that Staten Island is a part of New York City, which is a thing that happens.) I’ll report back here if I learn of anything to add, but in the meantime: Friends don’t let friends reprint sports team owner press releases without at least trying to check their facts, okay?

Share this post:

Every city in U.S. now building a soccer stadium, or at least it seems like it

Some days it seems like this site is turning into Soccer Pitch of Schemes. I mean, seriously, check this out:

The reason for this flood of soccer stadium building has less to do with soccer being the sport of millennials or whatever, and more to do with there being umpteen gazillion soccer teams in the U.S. now, and more on the way, and lots of them not having brand-new stadiums of their own because sometimes there just isn’t time to do that before you have to collect some more expansion fees, you know? Which should cut both ways — if MLS and the USL alike are going to expand to every city with its own post office, you’d think that cities wouldn’t need to spend big bucks on stadium funding in order to have a shot at a franchise — but here we have Switchbacks president Nick Ragain saying of the Colorado Springs vote that “what it means is we have a long-term professional soccer team in Colorado Springs,” and nobody in the media rolling their eyes, so I guess these are questions that are not asked in polite society.

And speaking of soccer and the media not rolling their eyes, yes, an Argentine football team celebrated the reopening of its stadium with a giant holographic flaming lion as many of you have emailed and tweeted at me, but also it’s not really a hologram and fans in the stadium couldn’t even see it except on TV screens. Number of news articles pointing this out: one; number of news articles going “Oooooh, fiery lion!”: more than I can count.

Share this post:

Friday roundup: Suns referendum campaign fails, Panthers owner floats roof, Inter Miami and Raiders both still need temporary homes

The stadium news does not care if I am having a busy week, it just keeps happening! And I am, as always, here to catch it in a bucket and dump it out for you:

Share this post:

That crazy idea to put a minor-league soccer stadium next to the Mets park is probably just a crazy idea

Back when news broke last month of a possible USL franchise called Queensboro F.C. building (or having built for it, or god knows what) a 25,000-seat minor league soccer stadium next door to the New York Mets‘ ballpark, on a plot of land originally cleared for affordable housing, I promised a more in-depth report. And now my report is up, at Gothamist, and it is way more loopy than even I could have expected:

Queens borough president Melinda Katz — one of the two task force co-chairs — has begun stepping up talk of what could be the least likely endgame of all for Willets Point: a professional soccer stadium that would take up as much as 17 acres of the redevelopment site, to be built with uncertain funds, for a minor-league soccer team called Queensboro F.C. that does not, strictly speaking, exist…

“The city spent approximately $200 million in acquiring these properties. I don’t think they did that to build a soccer stadium,” says Hiram Monserrate, the disgraced former state senator turned district leader who is affiliated with the new coalition Nos Quedamos Queens. (Nos Quedamos Queens, in turn, is unaffiliated with the older Bronx group Nos Quedamos, best known for its successful advocacy for the Melrose Commons project, by all accounts the most effective project in city history at constructing affordable housing without displacing existing residents.) “I’m a soccer fan. But you can’t build a sports coliseum at the expense of meeting the needs of the people, and the people need housing.”

If you can’t get into a story that pits a former city councilperson–turned–borough president–turned district attorney candidate (and also baby mama to Guardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa) against a city councilperson–turned–state senator–turned–jailbird for misuse of campaign funds–turned–community activist, all over whether to devote public land that was cleared of small businesses at great city expense (said businesses immediately going bankrupt at their new location) to a stadium for a soccer team that doesn’t exist yet or even have an identified owner, then, well, I don’t know why you’re reading this site.

The upshot, for those of you who are in a hurry, seems to be that Katz and her allies are grandstanding on this soccer idea for unknown reasons, but nobody else seems super-psyched about it, so it probably won’t happen. But it could happen, maybe, if the Mets owners want it to happen, which they probably don’t care that much about, but they might. Hopefully I will get a chance to revisit this story, because it exactly the kind of batshit that is incredibly fun to write about, not to mention a great cautionary tale of the dangers of farming out public policy to quasi-public agencies and secret task forces and the like.

Share this post:

Friday roundup: More Raiders temporary home rumors, more MLB expansion rumors, and pro cricket (?!?) in Texas

Was this week longer than usual, or did it just feel that way? The number of browser tabs I have open indicates the former — personally, I blame the moon.

  • Or maybe the Oakland Raiders will play in Arizona next year? When you have a lame-duck team whose new stadium in its new city isn’t ready yet, no idea is dumber than any other, really.
  • The University of Texas is reportedly building a new $300 million basketball arena at no cost to the state or the university, though if you read the fine print it’s actually getting Oak View Group (the same people behind Seattle’s arena rebuild) to build the arena in exchange for letting OVG keep a large chunk of future arena revenues. So really this is no different from UT building the arena themselves and using future revenues to pay off the construction costs, except I guess that OVG takes on the risk of cost overruns. Anyway, this is a good reminder that it’s not just about the costs, it’s about the revenues, stupid.
  • Las Vegas wants an MLB expansion team. It shouldn’t hold its breath.
  • There are lots of ideas for what to do with D.C.’s RFK Stadium site, and not all of them involve a stadium for Washington’s NFL team.
  • Queens community groups are protesting possible plans to build a soccer stadium for a would-be USL team called Queensboro F.C. on the Willets Point site cleared of businesses for redevelopment (including affordable housing) several years ago. This is a super-weird story that I’m still trying to get to the bottom of, so stay tuned for a more in-depth update soon.
  • Ottawa Senators owner Eugene Melnyk now says he’d consider letting someone else own his team’s proposed downtown arena if they’d pay to build it, contradicting what he said two years ago. Here’s a fun list of other times Melnyk contradicted himself!
  • Lots of public meetings coming up in Phoenix on the much-derided $230 million Suns arena renovation plan. The city has also posted the actual arena proposal, which among other things notes that the Suns’ rent is projected to go up from $1.5 million to $4 million a year in a renovated arena, which would help offset some of the public’s $168 million in costs, though it doesn’t say whether the rent (which is based on revenues) would go up in an unrenovated arena as well, so really this wouldn’t offset it all that much.
  • Speaking of the Suns, NBA commissioner Adam Silver said this week that “it’d be a failure on my part if a team ended up moving out of a market.” Now that’s how you play the army protection racket non-threat threat game! Rob Manfred, take notes. (Actually, please don’t.)
  • And speaking of Manfred, MLB is reportedly considering letting teams take control of their streaming broadcast rights instead of running them all centrally through MLB.tv, which would be a huge deal in that it would allow teams in large markets to monopolize streaming revenue like they currently do TV revenue, forestalling an NFL-like future where TV money is a more level playing field. They could offset this through increased revenue-sharing, sure, but … you know what, let’s table this discussion until there’s more than an unsourced New York Post item to go on.
  • Allen, Texas, is talking about building a pro cricket stadium via a “public-private partnership,” leaving me with two big questions: 1) how much is the public kicking in, and 2) maybe would it be a good idea to wait until a pro cricket league actually exists before building a stadium for it to play in?
  • The Athletic has a strangely formatted article about how finished MLS stadiums seldom look like their renderings that’s a fun read if you’re an Athletic subscriber, which you probably aren’t. (I got the $1-for-90-days trial deal, so I can keep tantalizing you with paywalled stuff for another few weeks yet.)
Share this post: