Thanks to everyone for helping us make it through another week! (I’m assuming here that it’s you readers who someone make time progress; I don’t actually know that much about science.)
Here’s what’s been happening that we haven’t talked about yet:
- A New York state assemblymember has introduced a bill to allow New York Mets owner Steve Cohen to build a casino in his stadium’s parking lot, which requires demapping it as parkland since that’s how it’s currently zoned. The THE CITY article reports that “the city would have to find at least 20 acres of replacement parkland or significantly improve other existing greenspace — paid for by the private developer”; but the actual bill says the city has to spend “an amount equal to or greater than the fair market value of the parklands being discontinued,” and it just needs to include 20 acres of “open space” on the current parking lots (possibly on the casino roof), to be paid for by Sir Not-Specified-in-This-Legislation. Local residents are excited, but probably not in the way Cohen was hoping!
- Los Angeles Angels owner Arte Moreno is set to meet with new Anaheim mayor Ashleigh Aitken, presumably to reopen talks about giving him development rights to the city-owned parking lots around his stadium. Maybe this time he’ll be willing to pay the full $500 million value of the property, instead of the $150 million the old mayor agreed to before being forced out of office by a scandal alleging he approved the Angels deal in exchange for campaign contributions? One can hope, or at least pretend to!
- Regina, Saskatchewan, may not be able to pick a tourism slogan that doesn’t sound wrong, but they have committed to building $490 million worth of new projects, including a new arena to host its junior hockey league team, the Regina Pats. Though not committed to paying for them, as “council is not making a commitment to spend all the money on all the projects,” said a council official. If anyone has $490 million sitting around, please contact Barry Lacey, executive director of financial strategy and sustainability, at this phone number.
- The Denver Broncos have done one of those push polls for season ticketholders to ask them which cool new things they want as part of their cool new stadium that would cost a rumored $2 billion. What’s more important, a roof or lots of restaurant chains? Would you prefer sports gambling or axe throwing? “There is something about a survey that makes the possibility of a Broncos’ new stadium a little more real,” says KUSA-TV, which is exactly the point of such a survey, but you can’t really expect a TV station to notice and remark on that when they can’t even copyedit headlines that read “Survey strikes cord to how Broncos new ownership wants fans’ input.”
- It’s rare that economist J.C. Bradbury gets upstaged in terms of quotes about why public funding of stadiums is a bad deal, but it’s hard to beat a Cleveland city councilmember who is quoted as saying about a new Browns stadium, “I’ve heard all the lines of (crap) about how we’re going to turn this around and turn that around. We’re going to benefit all these minority jobs and dah-dah-dah-dah. What a crock of (bleep).”
- Isn’t that rather a lot of drinks that the couple in the left corner of this Kansas City Current stadium bar rendering are drinking? It seems like rather a lot to me, though maybe they started off by ordering a pitcher of lemon water and two soup bowls to drink it out of, then decided to switch to (squints) orange juice?
- The amazing thing about Buffalo-area middle schoolers designing a new Bills stadium in Minecraft shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone who has seen middle schoolers with Minecraft, it’s that their design looks less ridiculous than the official one.