Friday roundup: Bears buy stadium land but won’t promise to build stadium on it, and other confusing news of the week

We have made it to the end of another week, or will soon, anyway. Why not celebrate with a round of bullet points about ways in which pro sports team owners are seeking to extract money from the public purse to use to pad their own profits? No, no, that was a rhetorical question, I’m sure you have many good reasons why not, but you’re here now and it’s too late to go back. so:

Share this post:

Friday roundup: MSG lobbies to stay put, OKC debates new Thunder arena, plus: BEES!

It’s been another week already, can you believe it? Before we get to the cavalcade of news items that didn’t make the cut for individual posts this week, it’s probably a good time for me to thank all of you who’ve generously supported this site with your hard-earned dollars to help me keep getting up at 7 am to report on this sports grift that doesn’t seem to have any intention of ending. So, thanks! And if you haven’t kicked in any coins of late and would like to, you can sign up for either a one-time donation or a small monthly payment — there are still a few cab-hailing lady art prints up for grabs!

Or just read the week’s news, that works too!

  • Madison Square Garden officials say they should get a perpetual operating permit from the city of New York because moving the arena elsewhere would cost $8.5 billion. Actually, the city could just send in its Padlock Unit (a real thing!) to lock the Knicks and Rangers out until James Dolan agreed to relocate the Garden on his own dime, or at least until he agreed to start paying property taxes, neither of which is likely to happen, but it could. The operating permit expires this July 31, so expect to see a whole lot more public grandstanding over the next six months, especially if the Knicks or Rangers make a deep playoff run (neither of which is likely to happen, but it could). Mayor Eric Adams says he wants to keep the Garden where it is but plans on being a “hard negotiator” for a renewed permit (which … okay, you already see where this parenthetical is going.)
  • Two competing Oklahoma City council candidates said they’re both in favor of building the Thunder a new arena (estimated cost: TBD) to replace their 21-year-old one, so long as the public gets something in return like “sales tax” or “full and thriving wages” for arena employees or “density.” (That’s in ascending order of likelihood, albeit descending levels of comprehensibility.)
  • Glendale, Arizona councilmember Joyce Clark is going to town on nearby Tempe’s planned arena for the Arizona Coyotes, posting back-to-back blog posts showing that team owner Alex Meruelo’s finances are considered high-risk and estimating that tax kickbacks for the project would amount to $700 million. In present value that’s probably more like $500 million, but it’s still not chicken feed; Tempe voters go to the polls on May 16.
  • Not saying that the Virginia legislature isn’t going to ever consider building a Washington Commanders stadium, but rejecting Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s request for $500,000 for “planning” a stadium proposal is a pretty good sign nothing’s going to move forward until legislators can dance on team owner Daniel Snyder’s (probably metaphorical, but either way works) grave.
  • Stadium architect Ron Labinski, who helped design Arrowhead Stadium, Giants Stadium, and whatever you call the Miami Dolphins‘ stadium these days, died recently at age 85, and condolences to his family and friends. The New York Times headlining his obit with the line that he “Designed a Cozier Future for Stadiums,” though, is pretty much 100% wrong, given that one of the hallmarks of his era as a stadium architect was building more luxury suites, which have forced upper decks into the stratosphere, making stadiums decidedly less cozy.
  • The bees are moving south! Run for your lives! Oh, wait, it’s just the Salt Lake Bees, and their new stadium in Daybreak is going to be “privately financed,” though the Bees owners still haven’t announced how that funding is going to work yet, maybe best to run for your lives anyway just to be on the safe side.
Share this post:

Friday roundup: How much economic impact won’t the Super Bowl have, and other dubious sports news

Under the present regime, there is no real downside risk to posting.” I probably should have spun this off into its own post, and added some anecdata about how when I post two items in one day it always seems like one of them gets overlooked, but then I would have to come up with an additional headline and post again to social media so screw it, just go give Tom Scocca the clicks, he needs ’em now that he doesn’t have a day job again.

Anyway, you probably skipped that to go straight to the bullet points, and here they are:

Share this post:

Penn Station redevelopment bites the dust, what will this mean for MSG, A’s, other “stadium district” plans?

Hey, remember back this summer when there was speculation that Madison Square Garden could be torn down and rebuilt in Manhattan’s Hudson Yards complex to make way for a sea of new office buildings around Penn Station (and maybe a rebuilt Penn Station too)? Welp, the prime developer behind the Penn Station redevelopment plan just announced that, uh, nope, not gonna be doing that:

Vornado Realty Trust said it won’t be erecting towers around Penn Station any time soon and will cut its dividend early next year to conserve cash.

“The headwinds in the current environment are not at all conducive to…development,” Chief Executive Steven Roth said on a conference call Tuesday.

Asked if he might revise his ambitious plans for redeveloping the area around Penn Station, perhaps by constructing more apartments and fewer offices, Roth said, “That’s not something we’re going to get into now.”

Yow! On the one hand, Roth’s announcement makes total sense: The office building market is in a tailspin, thanks to both the growth of remote work and rising interest rates for construction, which is the whole reason MSG-to-Hudson Yards wasn’t an entirely crazy idea. (Hudson Yards builder Related still has a large plot of railyards it has yet to develop with office buildings, and is in no hurry to do so because see above re: too damn many office buildings already.) On the other hand, this Penn Station redevelopment has been a huge deal both for Vornado and for New York Gov. Kathy Hochul for years now, and for Vornado to abruptly pull the plug is, well, abrupt.

There’ll likely be plenty of speculation about what this will mean for Hochul’s reelection campaign, but I’m more interested in what this will mean for the state of the “mixed-use developments” that have become part of many, many sports venue plans. If building a bunch of commercial towers around your stadium becomes more costly and less lucrative, suddenly it makes a lot less sense to, say, pay to build a stadium so long as you get $1 billion in infrastructure spending to make the rest of your development more profitable.

The reasonable response to this from city officials would be “Oh well, guess if there’s no market for commercial buildings then don’t build commercial buildings”; the expected response is more likely to be along the lines of “Oh no, we can’t get stadiums built by subsidizing profitable commercial real estate deals, we better figure out some other way of subsidizing them instead!” I mean, maybe I’m wrong and local electeds will exceed my expectations, but I’ve been betting the under on them for more than 25 years now, and haven’t gone wrong yet.

Share this post:

Friday roundup: Every disaster has a silver lining, and vice versa

When I was seven years old, my family drove down to Sanibel Island for vacation — twice in one year, for some reason — so I’m pretty familiar with the causeway bridge that was just wiped out by Hurricane Ian, which is very not good for anyone who is now entirely cut off from the mainland. I suppose I should make some observation about how the substitution effect means Sanibel’s loss will mean some other Florida beach spot’s economic gain, but too soon, people.

Share this post:

Friday roundup: MSG throws campaign cash around, Commanders on pace for new stadium (someday), OKC to build two arenas?

It was a slow week for stadium and arena news — even money-grubbing plutocrats and their elected-official pals like to go on vacation in the summer — but there are still a few more items of note that didn’t make it to posts of their own:

Share this post:

Could building a new $2B Madison Square Garden on old proposed Jets stadium site make any damn sense? A special report

New York City is in the midst of two mammoth publicly funded redevelopment projects, neither of which I’ve been covering here because they’re not sports-related, though they are sports-adjacent: The ongoing Hudson Yards project at the far western edge of midtown Manhattan got its start as a way to finance a New York Jets stadium that never happened, while a few blocks to the east, Govs. Andrew Cuomo and Kathy Hochul have both pushed for approving new skyscrapers around Penn Station as a way to pay for redoing that train station, which is almost entirely underground after Madison Square Garden was built atop it in the 1960s. (Both would result in billions in red ink for taxpayers, according to independent projections.)

Now, though, there’s been renewed talk of possibly connecting the two megaprojects in a way that’s very sports-related: Tearing down the current home of the Knicks and Rangers and building a new one a few blocks west on the last big plot of undeveloped Hudson Yards land. (Or virtual land: Right now it’s air space over an open cut rail yard.) I spent the last couple of weeks looking into this possibility for my friends at Hell Gate, the scrappy home of top journalists who don’t even have the pretense to put on collared shirts for a New York Times photo shoot; the whole story is a lot, as I write there, but here are a few quick takeaways:

  • MSG sits on land owned by Amtrak, but it is also required to have a special “operating permit” from the city to allow an entertainment venue of more than 2,500 seats. After its first 50-year stint, the operating permit was renewed by the city council for another decade; time having flown, though, that means it now expires next July 31, and people who want to see the Garden relocated so that a new Penn Station (or a new old Penn Station) can be built in its place are so excited they’re making fake drone videos scored to soft jazz.
  • Crain’s New York reported that Related Cos., the developer in charge of Hudson Yards, approached MSG about moving there and was turned down. (Sources: “an MSG representative.”) Neither Related nor MSG responded to my multiple requests for comment on this; Hochul’s office said that while the governor’s Penn Station plans “do not preclude moving MSG in the future when its useful life has expired,” there are “other more pressing priorities.”
  • Tearing down a recently renovated arena and building a whole new one would cost a buttload of money: The state estimated $8 billion last year, though much of this was for land acquisition and building a new Penn Station; arena construction costs were a marginally more reasonable $2 billion.
  • Since nobody involved is dying to spend even $2 billion on a new arena, seeing a way forward for a new MSG requires a whole lot of wishcasting: If Related boss (and Miami Dolphins owner) Stephen Ross decides that an arena is a better use of space than more office buildings in the post-office era, and if the city agrees to tear up its Hudson Yards financing plan that relies on payments in lieu of property taxes from those as-yet-unbuilt office buildings and instead okay a lesser-taxed arena, and if Hochul decides that enough public space advocates railfans would be mobilized to vote for her reelection if she put a recreated Penn Station on the table, then maybe it’s possible for an MSG relocation to work. Someone would still need to come up with that $2 billion for the new arena, though, plus a couple billion to rebuild the 1910-vintage Penn Station, plus whatever would be needed to bail out Hudson Yards’ public revenue shortfall, so New York taxpayers’ sea of red ink could end up getting even deeper.
  • The city council says any plan to address MSG’s operating permit will require going through a months-long land use process, which, uh, somebody should probably get cracking on that since next July 31 is less than a year away, especially what with days getting shorter and all.

The takeaway: This is all still extremely speculative, so much so that the only rendering in existence of a possible Hudson Yards MSG looks like it was carved from a block of cheese. It does, however, have all the elements of an epic sports arena battle — dueling billionaires! convoluted finances! terrible bro-y roots rock! — so it’s worth keeping an eye on, which Hell Gate and I both plan to do.

Share this post:

NYC will hand out $344m in tax breaks to the Nets, Knicks, Rangers, Mets, and Yanks in 2022 alone

The hits keep on coming from the new NYC news site Hell Gate, which I wrote for last week about how Gov. Kathy Hochul’s $1 billion Buffalo Bills subsidy was eased by the fact that New York state hates letting voters have input into actual budget decisions. On Monday, it was Doug Turetsky, former chief of staff of the city Independent Budget Office and a journalist before that, reporting on how much money New York City’s sports teams saved last year via not having to pay property taxes on their teams’ homes. How much, you ask? How much:

Take Barclays Center. The arena hasn’t paid property taxes since it opened in 2012. It’s a tax expenditure that will cost the city $85 million this year alone, according to the City’s Department of Finance Annual Tax Expenditure Report

Madison Square Garden, the home of the Knicks and the Rangers, which are each estimated to be the most valuable teams in their respective leagues, benefits from politicians’ largesse too. MSG’s tax break is worth about $42 million this year, according to the Finance Department report…

The city will forgo about $111 million for Yankee Stadium this year and $106 million for the Mets’ Citi Field, according to the tax expenditure report.

That’s a total of $344 million that the NetsKnicksRangersMets, and Yankees would normally be paying to the city in 2022, but aren’t because they don’t wanna. For the Knicks and Rangers, it’s because Mayor Ed Koch accidentally (he swore) gave them a special tax break in 1982 with no end date; for the Nets, Mets, and Yankees, it’s because they arranged to build on city- or state-owned land, then arranged to direct all payments in lieu of property taxes back into their own pockets to pay off their own construction costs, a gambit that helped them qualify for tax-exempt bonds that privately funded stadiums normally aren’t eligible for. (The IRS later closed that loophole, but not before the three NYC teams walked through it.)

None of this is unusual — as Turetsky points out, each and every year New York City forgoes about $7 billion in tax revenue via various and sundry tax breaks. Three years ago, I reported for Gothamist on a pair of 20-year-old tax breaks that the IBO had found to be utterly useless at creating jobs or reducing office vacancies, costing the city $400 million over that time. The two programs, the Commercial Revitalization Program and the Commercial Expansion Program, had been launched in 1995 and 2000 with exactly the sort of public oversight you would imagine:

“I have asked, ‘Show me one study, one survey that will prove or at least indicate that if we put this amount of money into commercial modernization and residential conversion that we’re actually going to create the jobs that are being claimed, that we’re going to get a good return for the public investment,'” [state senator Franz] Leichter said during the brief senate debate over the bill. “You know what? There isn’t one survey. They haven’t made one market study.”

True, no studies had been done, admitted bill sponsor Martin Connor. But, he asserted, none were needed.

“Senator Leichter says, ‘Where is the study?’ Well, we’ve all seen studies and reports and false promises in paper. The people in this business, in this real estate market, got together with their consultants and devised this because they believe it works, and they are the people that have to go out and sell. They’re the people who have to go out and sign those leases, sign up those tenants with these employees, and they believe it will work, and I say give them a chance.”

In 2019, I wrote that thanks to a newly attentive city council and that IBO report, “all signs are that [the CRP and CEP] will soon be gone.” Hey, how’s that going, anyway? Doug?

Together, [the Commercial Revitalization and Commercial Expansion Programs will] cost about $22 million in lost revenue this year…

So where’s Mayor [Eric] Adams on reviewing the dozens of tax expenditures made by the city? The executive budget he released last month reiterates the need for “staying focused on the efficient use of government resources.”…

The mayor’s press office did not respond to a request for comments on the administration’s plans for evaluating the array of city tax breaks.

Always remember: Only the little people pay taxes.

Share this post:

Friday roundup: Tempe arena could depend on election, Bears land buy in limbo, Inter Miami stadium maybe finally not?

Happy Friday! I have a fresh shipment of fridge magnets set to arrive this weekend, so if you’re a new or re-upped Field of Schemes subscriber waiting for yours, you shouldn’t have to wait long. And if you’re just waiting for the week’s roundup of stadium and arena news, you don’t have to wait at all, just to the end of this sentence, I swear we’ll get there soon, here we go:

  • Hopefuls for Tempe’s city council were asked about the proposed Arizona Coyotes arena with potentially more than $200 million in tax subsidies at a candidate forum last night, and their answers were: “good deal,” tax subsidies are bad, economic development is good but tax subsidies are maybe bad, economic development is good but traffic is bad, Tempe should “evaluate everything very carefully,” development is good but only if it doesn’t cost too much, and jobs are good but tax subsidies are bad. There’s no real way of reading tea leaves there to tell who would vote which way on an arena, but with three new councilmembers set to be seated in July, it certainly could tip the fragile balance that is currently running slightly anti-arena, maybe, if unnamed sources are to be believed.
  • Glendale, meanwhile, is about to embark on a $40 million renovation of the Coyotes’ old arena to optimize it for concerts, which, sure, at that relatively modest price tag it might actually pay for itself. Plus if there aren’t enough concerts, there’s always professional bull riding.
  • The Chicago Bears owners still haven’t bought the Arlington Racecourse site as they say they want to, and may not until 2023, and even then will only “decide whether it’s financially feasible to try to develop it further,” according to team president Ted Phillips. From the outside, the answer to that appears to be “nope, doesn’t look like it, but hey it’s your $2 billion,” but as it’s still possible the team may ask for public money, it’s worth keeping an eye on even if you’re not a Bears fan concerned about where you’ll have to be spending your Sundays starting in 2027 or something.
  • This actually happened last week, but Miami Mayor Francis Suarez and Inter Miami owner Jorge Mas say they’ve finally reached an agreement on a new stadium at Melreese golf course, with the city commission to vote on it maybe as soon as the end of the month. The Miami Herald is skeptical, as anyone should be given how long Mas and his co-owner David Beckham have been trying to work out a Miami stadium deal, but I guess stay tuned both for whether a vote takes place and for what exactly the details will be of what they’re voting on.
  • You people keep asking me about this article in the Buffalo Chronicle claiming that New York Gov. Kathy Hochul wants to build a new Madison Square Garden in a public park where my son’s high school soccer team used to practice, and my response is that not only does it cite no named sources (just “an official with Empire State Development”), and my answer is that the Buffalo Chronicle seems to be not a real news outlet, but rather a site run by a PR consultant for “Native American financiers” who runs whatever stories he wants in order to “shape the public discourse.” Also both Hochul’s office and Empire State Development say the story is made up, so please let’s not waste more time and energy debating whether this non-plan would make any sense.
  • I know it’s not technically stadium news, but if you’d like to read about how legalized sports gambling isn’t likely to produce the tax windfall that states are hoping for, I wrote an article about this for my old Vice Sports editor Patrick Hruby at Global Sport Matters, go check it out.
  • And I also know I spend a lot of time picking on understaffed news sites for terrible reporting and worse copy editing, but you gotta admit it’s pretty hilarious that WYRK-FM in Buffalo has has a headline up for two days reading “Here’s What the New Bills Stadium Should Like.” I sincerely hope it’s strawberry ice cream.
Share this post:

Friday roundup: St. Louis to get $790m Rams payoff from NFL or Kroenke or both, MSG deemed too pricey to move

Not even sure how many people are out there reading this rather than still Thanksgivinging (Canadians, right?), but the news sure hasn’t taken a break for the short holiday week:

Share this post: