Friday roundup: A’s owner wants public to fund “some” of $1B Vegas stadium, Coyotes swear they’re not moving to Houston, and more

Happy December! I was up real late last night, so let’s get straight to the remaining news of the week:

  • Nevada Gov.  says he’s “not inclined” to call a special session of the state legislature to figure out how to fund an Oakland A’s stadium in Las Vegas, says A’s owner John Fisher is looking for a $1 billion retractable-roofed ballpark, and indicated, “They wanted some public money. In what form, they didn’t really specify.” He also said that he wouldn’t further raise hotel taxes, the revenue source that paid for the Las Vegas Raiders stadium, and “I explained to them that I didn’t want to be a stalking horse. They said they weren’t doing that, and they were serious about this.” That’s what everyone says, even those proposing stalking horses! At least we know now that Fisher wants “some” public money toward a $1 billion Vegas stadium, if he’s serious about building one; admittedly it’s not much, but in 2021 we have to be happy with any morsel of facts we can come by.
  • The Arizona Coyotes front office has issued a statement that no matter what Forbes’ Mike Ozanian says, they’re not selling the team to someone who’ll move it to Houston. Either this is going to be hilariously awkward to walk back if the rumor turns out to be true, or Ozanian doesn’t know what he’s talking about again.
  • David Gilbert, president and CEO of Destination Cleveland, on the Guardians‘ freshly approved $285-million-or-more stadium renovation subsidy: “Economically, people can talk about whether or not it’s right for public funding to be part of professional sports facilities, but in our country, it is a reality.” I have misplaced my tourism-official-to-English dictionary, but I’m pretty sure that translates as “Yeah yeah, right and wrong, this is just standard business procedure, that’s all America has ever cared about.”
  • Now that the St. Louis Rams lawsuit is all over but for the shouting about how the NFL and Rams owner Stan Kroenke will split the $790 million settlement cost, it’s also time for the city and county of St. Louis and the local stadium authority to fight about how they will split the proceeds.
  • Buffalo’s Investigative Post is suing the state of New York to force the release of two studies commissioned by the Bills owners that looked into the relative feasibility of building a new stadium or renovating the existing one, and evaluated the economic impact of the Bills’ presence in the state. Please note that this is not the study of stadium renovation costs that Erie County is refusing to release without blacking out almost all of it; rather, these are two other studies that Gov. Kathy Hochul is refusing to release at all, though her administration admits it has copies. The odds on the suit forcing the documents’ release before Hochul puts a new stadium in the 2022 state budget seem slim, but at least maybe it will let us point and laugh after the fact.
  • The New York Islanders‘ new arena is causing a traffic nightmare for its neighbors in Elmont, with fans “parking anywhere they want, urinating and cursing,” according to WCBS-TV. Things may improve once a new arena parking garage is complete, but it’s probably best not to hope that a lot more fans will start taking the train instead.
  • “Last year, a report out of central Florida showed that only 23.9 percent of NFL senior executives are anything but white men. All of that whiteness has manifested itself, disproportionately, in the stands and in luxury boxes, where white NFL owners get brandished on every telecast as their team’s No. 1 fan. Those owners have endeavored to remake the front-facing part of their customer base in their image, and they are succeeding. Money is their foremost tool to accomplish this task.” That all is some pretty solid structural political analysis, especially from a column titled Drew Magary’s Thursday Afternoon NFL Dick Joke Jamboroo.
Share this post:

Houston could get an NHL team, or could just be used to extort other NHL cities for cash

If you’ve always wondered why Houston, the United States’ 10th largest media market, didn’t have an NHL franchise, this is your week. Starting last Thursday, when The Athletic (citing the ever-popular “multiple sources”) reported that NHL commissioner Gary Bettman and new Houston Rockets owner Tilman Fertitta had met to talk about putting a team in the city, there’s been increased blind speculation about the possibility, to the point where the Houston Chronicle ran an entire article about what the phantom team would be called.

Most recently, the Houston Press, a newspaper that recently canceled its print edition and laid off its entire staff except for its editor-in-chief, who now works solely with freelancers, reported that now that Fertitta owns the Rockets and their arena, bringing hockey to Houston is “just a matter of when.” And lawyer-by-day-sports-journalist-by-night John Royal, citing the less-popular “it’s become my understanding,” says that the NHL isn’t considering expansion for the moment, but instead would prefer to “stabilize” one of its existing franchises by moving it to a new city:

There are numerous candidates for relocation to Houston. No. 1 on the list is the Arizona Coyotes which is begging the Phoenix-metro area to build it a new arena after failing to attract fans to the taxpayer-funded arena built for the Coyotes in Glendale and which is currently playing on a year-to-year lease. Then there are the Carolina Hurricane which have been struggling at the gate. The New York Islanders are unhappy in a new arena in Brooklyn and are seeking to move, and the Calgary Flames are threatening to move if a new arena is not built by Calgary taxpayers.

(Yes, “the Arizona Coyotes which is.” Clearly they laid off all the copy editors, too.)

All of this makes sense, sort of, though for the Islanders and Flames in particular you have to wonder whether giving up strong media markets that are hockey hotbeds in exchange for a city in the South would work as well as … well, as the Coyotes and the Hurricanes, which let’s not forget are in this predicament because they used to be the Winnipeg Jets and the Hartford Whalers. The Coyotes, in particular, couldn’t really do worse than in Arizona, where they are about to have no arena lease and have never drawn well in any case.

On the other hand, when you see all the unnamed sources involved, you have to at least ask the question: Is all this sudden Houston talk in part an NHL whisper campaign to rattle move-threat sabers in other cities? So far nobody appears to be freaking out — Fansided’s Flames blog briefly mentioned and dismissed the possibility of Calgary’s team heading south, for example, despite Sportsnet’s John Shannon insisting that “Calgary’s name has been added to the list of teams facing possible relocation” — which is good, but nobody has yet hopped on a plane to Houston or anything.

And really, even if Fertitta’s interest in a team is real — and there’s no reason to think it isn’t, though it is a bit puzzling that former owner Les Alexander figured he made more money on concerts and the like than hockey, but Fertitta calculates otherwise — it’d be dumb for the NHL not to use this as an opportunity to shake down other cities for arena cash or other concessions. Houston as an NHL city would be somewhat valuable, if only for its market size, though again, it’s only slightly larger than Phoenix and that worked out spectacularly poorly; Houston as a bogeyman to frighten other cities (along with Seattle once that city’s arena deal is finalized) could potentially be the gift that keeps on giving. Watch the blogs and sports talk radio, I guess, to see how this will all play out.

Share this post: